Best Santelli Rant in a while..

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Tsing Tao, Sep 21, 2012.

  1. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Fair enough, but you have to be fair in return. If you supported QE2, you must have thought QE1 did something positive, or else why would you support the next one? etc.

    Two data points on a chart (above) doesn't exactly constitute recovery. But whatever. My point still remains that the Fed that you support does not feel that the economy is improving, else they would have ended QE. So either their criteria changed, or yours did to stop supporting it.


    I would have let the system cleanse itself. I would have used the scenario to institute strong fiscal integrity, and split speculative banks from their depositors (Glass-Steagall or something like it). I would have jailed those responsible for fraud and pursued justice on those in TBTF banks that knowingly took on too much risk and brought the system down. I would have clawed back bonuses. I would have let GM face chapter 11 and re-org itself the way Chapter 11 allowed it to. Those who took risk (bond holders) in companies around the world would have suffered losses, the way they were supposed to. IF government money was to be used, then it would have been used to protect depositors from loss, up to 100,000$ as was FDIC policy.

    Would there have been chaos? You betcha. About 6 months of hell - or maybe even a year. Then, slowly, we would have crawled back to a sound financial system that was worthy of trust. I would have never been re-elected, I'm sure, but the country would have been much better off for it. Instead, we are worse off than before the crisis. Banks are more bloated and riskier than ever. Mark to Market is still suspended. Speculators are at it again, enabled and emboldened because they now know the Fed has their back. We have high unemployment, record debt and the Fed's balance sheet is atrocious. And we've got nothing to show for it. Nothing is fixed - at all.

    It's a cesspool.
     
    #211     Jul 16, 2013
  2. pspr

    pspr

    Don't worry, Rectum, I'm here for ya'. I know you have errors and downright lies in nearly all of your posts and I try to report on as many as I can. I'll try to be more diligent in the future at catching and pointing out your gross errors and deceit.
     
    #212     Jul 16, 2013
  3. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

     
    #213     Jul 16, 2013
  4. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Why is lil' ricky aka rectum participating in this thread?
    He doesn't know anything about economics.
     
    #214     Jul 16, 2013
  5. pspr

    pspr

    He knows about communism. Or, how to ruin your country's economy.
     
    #215     Jul 16, 2013
  6. In other words, it's nothing more than a herd of brainwashed Krugman acolytes and sycophants. Just the thought of a place like that on the internet is nauseating...

    (Let me guess, if you disagree with Krugman, you get banned)
     
    #216     Jul 16, 2013
  7. All he knows is whatever Krugman tells him to think.

    The guy can't tie his own shoes and would be pumping gas if his father in law didn't have to worry about the well being of his daughter.
     
    #217     Jul 16, 2013
  8. pspr

    pspr

    LOL I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt after beating up on him all day. I guess I should have said, he knows how to spell communism. :D
     
    #218     Jul 16, 2013
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    That's good work for you, pisspoor, you stay on that.
     
    #219     Jul 16, 2013
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    No, but you are a drunk a liar and a troll.
     
    #220     Jul 16, 2013