Yes that may cause a drop off in those wanting to learn the full methodology. Roger also feels many will still want to know how the trade signals are constructed, and will want the full aspects of the course (methodology, psychology curriculum, live training, etc). He is not worried about the room being useless at all from what he sees going forward.
<i>"Simple test now a days..is their system defined enough and "automated"....?"</i> Simple test for any system: Let's say it becomes offered to the public. Out of two hundred system package sales over time, five of those purchasers have big money. Four decide to trade 1,000 contracts each. The fifth system purchaser opts to trade 2,000 contracts. Net sum of 6,000 ES contracts all lined up for entry and exit on the tick, each time a signal is generated. What happens to the system results? * Think those #s of contracts are outlandish? Hardly. Not at all. If results are stellar, sooner than later more than 10,000 ES contracts will line up for every signal at the same tick. Then what?
That will be a cool problem!!! Lets see..what time frame are they using and what time frame am I on? When I am trading the ZB, or the ER2, or CL, or the SPY, will they be on all those too at the same time frame settings I will be on (remember..the time frame you use is up to you..you have full flexibility with the system)? You are looking at the planets 174 galaxies away before looking at the planets in your own galaxy..those are "way out there" problems imo. Damn it..the system is too good to use..now that is a really cool problem imo.
You are generally right, but here is a system: It fires off 1 ONCE a day and holds for 1-3 hours or until SL hit. Do you really think that 1-2-3 ticks difference would make a big difference for the subscribers???