if you mean to say that you will be posting a list of companies looking for write offs please inform when you do by posting an alert on this very thread. Also, if you have a list of companies ready for donation/ write offs, bring them to me and I will probably be able to offer you a finder's fee. And if you mean otherwise, I don't know what you mean?
A message board where you'll feel far more at home. http://www.hipforums.com/ It's a hippy message board I like. (My thinking does overlap with theirs on personal liberty issues. )
You mean like that well-known socialist tree-hugger, Margaret Thatcher? As for the world's greatest natural resource, isn't that human beings? How many artists would be supported by a colony of Hyenas? How much philosophy do you think you'd get out of a Tiger Shark? Sorry but a termite mound or a beaver dam isn't my idea of artistic creativity.
If you were up 200% last month, that means that in early Nov you had 1/3 your current capital. If you are up 50% since June, that means that your June capital was an amount 2/3 the size of your current capital. Therefore you suffered a 50% drawdown between June and early Nov.
all my work, all my effort... its journey starts at the subjective atmosphere of the untouchable spirits and reaches the objectivism as the supreme goal... and all that is possible on account of the path of materialism. To feel without being able to touch is nothing but memory territory. At least thats the way I feel sometimes. I admit that platonic love does exist, but it can get as evil proprieties as cancer when the lack of touch is present. the second part of the quote... eventhough it is pure uthopia I say: go for it man. (and I must say, rowenwood, I enjoy reading your inputs in this thread)
I hope this character is not pulling our leg. The real message from the environmentalists is a psychologically damaging one: Don't exist!! Evil parents give out that message to their children and the children eventually become troubled teens, suicidal, etc. Read "People of the Lie" by Scott Peck to get filled in on that situation. We damage the environment by using trees?? The environuts just burned millions of acres of trees. They fought proper forest management tooth and nail in the courts, always because of "sensitive habitat" and "endangered species" and they caused it all to burn!! I'm still tying to figure out where they are coming from, even for Marxist a%holes they don't add up, finally I just decided it is a psychological "don't exist" and "we can get control of your natural resources" message. The whole PC message is just "Don't exist if you are successful". I saw some Hell's Angels invade a campground in Big Sur once, riding around, shooting into cars, etc. They ran off all the hippies. I was appalled at the time but nowadays, I feel they weren't that wrong to do that, it would be really satisfying to roust a bunch of environuts, shoot up their cars, send them on their way on foot and tell them "Burn this, mutha". Environuts pose as these holier than thou self righteous people and deliver this "don't exist" message. I work with one, I get to upset the little moron any time I feel like it, been doing it for years, he is pretty unhappy today, believe me!! He can't win or quit, just the way I like it.
poor trees. The problem you are pointing out lays in the mankind reproduction process, not in capitalism. The merit of this issue is much more in how much we are than how much we consume. The mankind reproductive process my friend. If all countries had the same population density as China we all would be doomed. It amazes me how almost no one bothers to discuss the human supply, considering its a necessity to dominate such science before scratching surface plans.