Berkshire Profit on Goldman Sachs Passes $2 Billion

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by ASusilovic, Jul 23, 2009.








  1. You are dead wrong. Comically-wrong.

    He wrote it off on the quarter.

    Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has reported a 62 percent drop in its 2008 net income because investment and derivative losses of nearly $7.5 billion weighed on the results.
     
    #181     Apr 24, 2014
  2. Wrong again.

    Only the index values at the expiration dates matter. The changes in the fair values of the contracts that are reported in earnings are just paper losses. Everyone knows that except you and it obviously hasn't affected the share price as you "thought" it would.

    From Berkshire's 2012 letter to shareholders:

    [​IMG]

    You didn't answer my question. How'd your BRKb short work out for you, chicken little? :D Idiot.

    [​IMG]
     
    #182     Apr 24, 2014
  3. You are criminally stupid. Buffett disagrees as he wrote it off income. Buffett is referring to counter-party assignment, not earnings statements. He wrote off billions as a result of the short puts. a MTM loss against GI and the massive tax implications.
     
    #183     Apr 24, 2014
  4. Right moron... just like Berkshire was a short in July 2012 :D
     
    #184     Apr 24, 2014
  5. He wrote off 7.5B against GI which you stated he would not, lol. It's called a MTM loss/haircut. So apparently it matters... to the balance sheet. You're defending the impossible, but it's entertaining.

    To date, BRK MTM losses have exceeded MTM gains (on quarterly ES) from the index put shorts.
     
    #185     Apr 24, 2014
  6. Speaking of tilt. Tilt. Tilt. Difficult to keep up with your desperate changes & edits.

    Once again moron -- the changes in the fair values of the contracts that are reported in earnings are paper losses. And they've impacted the share price accordingly.

    Hey -- where's that "shoe to drop in 2012" and how'd your Berkshire short do? :D
     
    #186     Apr 24, 2014
  7. You are criminally stupid. Buffett disagrees as he wrote it off income. Buffett is referring to counter-party assignment, i.e., he cannot be forced to cover, but not earnings statements. He wrote off billions as a result of the short puts. a MTM loss against GI and the massive tax implications.

    He wrote off 7.5B against GI which you stated he would not, lol. It's called a MTM loss/haircut. So apparently it matters... to the balance sheet. You're defending the impossible, but it's entertaining.

    To date, BRK MTM losses have exceeded MTM gains (on quarterly ES) from the index put shorts.
     
    #187     Apr 24, 2014
  8. No, this trade resulting from your delusions about Berkshire is impossible to defend and entertaining :D

    [​IMG]
     
    #188     Apr 24, 2014


  9. He marked the losses against GI which dramatically impacted taxes. BRK has lost more (against their sheet) than they have gained. On the quarterlies. Public info. The trade was a disaster.

    BRK has lost more (reported) on the index derivatives then they have gained, as declared.
     
    #189     Apr 24, 2014
  10. That was in response to the above quote that you posted.

    Yeah I've read the SEC filings and the market cared so much about the paper losses on the derivatives that YOUR trade was a disaster.
     
    #190     Apr 24, 2014