These "browns" all have Belgian nationality, and many were even born there. Just like the"browns" in the US. But as an American you probably see it in another, subjective way. There are more massacres on wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wounded_Knee_Massacre
No shit, otherwise they wouldn't be on the national team. But if you look up the Belgian team 30 years earlier, it was 100% white. Now it is almost 40% brown. I assume there were brown Belgians 30 years ago too. So they were under represented. I could say colored players are over represented now. Not saying it is good or bad, just a statistical comparison based on population stats. The US will lose its whiteness (blacks and Latinos will outnumber them) by 2040 or 50 I forgot. I guess a historical justice in the happening...(not saying it is good or bad, just stating the trends) Wounded Knee was a teaparty compared to Leopold. The Congo lost like 10 M people because of the Belgian rule. But anyhow, both England and Belgium made it so I guess they were both winner. Speaking of England, lots of brown people there too... The Empire strikes back!
Britain and France did try to be nice to their conquered people generally and forwarded their development a lot. But that was another age. Talking of numbers how many people has the US killed in the Middle East in the last 4 decades ? At a guess well over 2 million and it continues. Russia and Britain have bloody hands too. It usually comes back in the form of revenge.
Looks like the OP had it right about Belgium winning the match. As long as Croatia and the itches don't triumph tonight then England will try to do another Waterloo on the Frenchies. Will be a big ask as they are a very talented side.
Note that England has a very well developed 3-5 man defense scheme. France's advantage is in speed. Would be a great match.
Belgium had same formation more or less and France did struggle to score but Belgium had world class players in their 3-5 (Kompany, Fellaini, Witsel, Adler, and the V guy, backed by top 3 GK in the world). Belgium also has the best front 3 in the Cup (Lukaku, Hazard and De Bruyne) and France shut them out. I still have to give the edge to France v. Croatia in the final. England is using young players who are up and coming and they are playing really well. But that back line is going to be overworked v. Croatia let alone France. Croatia is a better team than England right now so let us not overlook Croatia like others have. I think England had the easiest path to the final as was pointed out. A group they could easily finish 2d in and 2 knock out games against not the best opponents or top form opponents. Croatia will be a real gut punch for England. Mbappe of France though is RIDICULOUSLY fast....wow....Griezmann, Mbappe, Pogba, Kante....Giroud so-so...beating Belgium they cemented the Cup for me if they play the same way. Courtois saved 3 goals..could have been 4-0. France Croatia will be a better matchup for the final I think. England will lose to Belgium again in the 3rd place game.