The major reason of misunderstanding BE->DO->HAVE is laziness. People do not realize that DO requires many,many,many hours of hardwork...
why don't you post the codes? so that we can examine it and find out where did it go wrong? maybe your code is bad? your know the GIGO stuff?
Wow, I am impressed by your intimate knowledge of the church sanctuary. You must have read every post of the Hershey threads. another seasoned basher with a new handle?
I especially like this quote from an ongoing Hershey inspired fantasy: "Spotted the FTT at 09:45, no problem, but completely lost the plot after 10:20. Every FTT seemed to fizzle out, which in hindsight turned out to be a very volatile LTR traverse. The 5 min seemed âtoo coarseâ due to the high volatility, and I ended up widening my long channel 5 times. I found the Gaussians to be particularly difficult to follow. After each FTT I saw a BO of the current RTL but then b2b reappeared. Again with hindsight this looks very clear but it seemed highly confusing at the time." The Hershey fantasy is that losing trades are called "mistakes" and with enough whatever they will eventually be eliminated. Objective reality dictates that uncertainty is always present in trading. Identical looking situations with respect to similar "data sets" ,as JH terms them, will not always produce the same result. In a binary activity,i.e., win/lose,in/out,long/short this shortcoming must be dealt with by resorting to probabilities. Probabilities are something which Hershey denies. He asserts that the market can be known with certainty. New traders seem to agree. Seasoned traders know better. Another chasm not to be bridged by US to THEM.
it took ebulldog and Jack, and T6's reply to prompt me for a second read, then I was rolling on the floor laughing.