Hey Testy McTest, I wouldnt doubt one bit that your "testing" results did not work at all. This method is far too complex to code correctly BUT as a human being trading the method and understanding things down cold, well....thats a whole new ballgame. Give it a try for yourself, commit some time and energy and do it MANUALLY.
The last person to post their blotter received accusations of 'photoshopping' the results. Others have been accused of fraudulent activities. Within this very thread, one individual 'called his trades' only to be told, "Well that wasn't quite good enough." I've called and posted trades the night before the stocks went up. Easyrider posted his account totals. Mak has posted his trades. ETlurker posted screenshots of his automated system running in real time. Mischief posted his code for automated trading. cnms2 posted his execution reports - before, during and after execution. Numerous others have posted their blotters. Yet here we are again, having the same discussion ad infinitum with people acting as if this 'proof' they have requested never existed. The conversation always ends the same exact way. No amount of 'proof' has ever been good enough, never will be, and that is just fine with me. Good Trading to you all. - Spydertrader
No debate here, I make great money daily b/c I have worked very hard and have adopted fundamental principles that work day in and day out in the S&P. Its no magic formula but it does requires 100's of hours of training yourself to get in sync with how the market operates. I know YOU dont want to hear this b/c that would mean you'd have to do some serious hard work just to get started. That, alone, is enough to filter out the riff raff.
So why is our test of the material a Pass and yours a Fail??? A car manual doesn't show you how to apply pressure to the gas pedal. Is the car broken because you read the manual completely and did what it says and yet it did not get you to point B, or would you say that the manual is incomplete? Some have attempted to fill in the remaining programming details. So what's common sense for some of us may possibly not be so common sense for others. If a crazy person then walks up to the car and tells you to put the keys in the ignition, turn on the car, buckle your safety belt, step on the brake, put the car in drive, and then apply pressure to the gas pedal while controlling the steering wheel so that you can begin your way to point B, was the instruction set an obfuscation technique that does not address why the car is at point A (ie. negative EQ curve). You are at point A. The car manual tells you about the instruments in the car that assist in getting to point B. However, there are things that the manual takes for granted (ie. it's not idiot proof). It won't tell you how to make a right hand turn nor tell you what is your left and what is your right. In other words, the car manual is not the whole picture for getting to point B. If this is obfuscation, that what is not?
Which way did the market move after he posted? Forget his entry point. From the time he posted where did the market sit? and then where did it go? Not good enough? OK, this guy posted his calls and charts in real time - yesterday. As I have stated, no amount of proof will ever be good enough. - Spydertrader
Yeah, like I am really going to answer your question with that completely insincere attitude. I will tell you this though, I did net out 5 figs today...now that could be 10k or 99k. But since we did the math on our earlier trade together and saw that that was a 10k trade, I will let you use your imagination.
Perhaps thats what you require to feel good about yourself, I dont need anyones respect or praise on an anonymous board. I am 35, in good health, have a great wife and get to trade in my sleep clothes and make excellent money that affords me a very comfortable life.....and besides....if I was ever going to post results from a day it would most certainly have been yesterday
Ha! I WANT you to not believe me so you will continue your subpar approach to trading. The last thing I want is to have 50 guys doing what I do (maybe even better than me). I guarentee if I post this months results the hits on the futures thread would quadruple. The ONLY reason I am still posting here is I know you dont believe anything I say and I am just having a good old time teasing you. The fact of the matter is, the great majority of people are too lazy to undertake the effort required so I'm really not too worried about it. You seem like one of those people Tazzy. Btw, to those couple bashers from this thread who pm'ed me singing a different tune, I've disabled my PM so you, or anyone else, cannot message me. Its funny how you guys act so tough here and then secretely message me basically probing for more info. How sad End communication....
LOL, if I told you, you'd just discredit it as impossible anyways so what is the point. and, btw 3 times the daily range is phenominal. I'm not an expert enough to produce those results yet. But....you dont have to to make sick money.