BE DO HAVE and Jack Hershey vs Objective Reality

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by ^^^^^^, Feb 26, 2007.

  1. Not sure what you mean... but I do know that it was valid enough to make Jack try to defend his -23.8% "performance."
     
    #181     Feb 28, 2007
  2. I hadn't planned to post any more in this thread, but evidently, some people need a refresher on their memory .....

    We discussed this before and I provided you an opportunity, not only to learn from your errors in logic, but also to prove once and for all if Jack's methods held any weight.

    How did that turn out?

    You declined calling my response a red herring. Funny, I point out the logic inconsistencies to your assertions, and provide you with a solid method for ridding this place of me and my Journals, and yet, you decline?

    Please. Get Real.

    I even offered a second time, in case you somehow misunderstood, but you never seem to change your spots, do you? I wonder why you never seem to get it right? When other people can automate the process. I even posted backtested results, but as is always the case, you conveniently ignore the facts presented to you. So after my second attempt to offer a solution, you declined a second time, and provided more excuses why you couldn't get things right.

    And here you are once again trying to claim another lie as truth. Clearly, Nwbprop provided crystal clear direction with his post - but you new that way back here - from the same thread.

    Additional backtested results from one of the guys who automated the process were posted as well. Geez. One needs a degree in calculus to keep up with the lies told in this thread.

    It's one thing to claim you didn't see the information. It's quite another to act is if the information doesn't exist.

    With respect to Mak's posted backtests and track record, do you have an inability to utilize the search function?

    Come on now people, wake up. Use your own brains for a second. If you really want to believe that people from all over the world (most of whom have never met save for a few messages on the internet) decided to create a grand conspiracy and fake their results, well then by all means, continue on with that belief system. However, you really need to stop acting like anybody owes you a set of proofs. Nobody owes anybody a damn thing in this business. The sooner you recognize that fact, the better off you'll be. The ironic part is, if this were packaged and sold on a late night infomercial, half the people posting would have already rushed right out to buy it, but because it has been handed over for free it therefore must be fraudulent.

    It's real easy to shove the whole thing off to the side and call it a cult and describe those that trade Hershey's methods as those following some 'guru' - as if we all travelled to Tucson to drink gallons of homemade 'Kool-Aid' in order to 'see the light.' If that helps you cope, keep on with that fantasy. If you need that sort of reality to get through your day, great. More power to you. Those of us who trade the methods don't 'follow' a person, we trade based on a methodology that is different from your own.

    I see the market differently than most people do. If I see it differently than you, it doesn't make either of us wrong - no matter how much you may wish it so. If you fail to see value in what I do, I have no problem with that, nor do I plan to spend any more time convincing you value exist where you fail to recognize it. Doing so is nothing more than a wasted exercise as neither of us has any plans of changing our viewpoint.

    I have said it before, and I'll say it again, everyone should investigate for themselves whether or not something is true or valid. Don't take my word for it. Don't take anyone's word for it. Remain skeptical and use your own brain to determine the best course of action. If you determine this isn't for you, great. Wonderful. One less thing to worry about.

    Good trading and Success to you all.

    - Spydertrader
     
    #182     Feb 28, 2007
    Sprout likes this.

  3. Mon frere, you did not read furthur down in the thread... eek. It is not intraday...
    Some industry traders don't even trade that many in a whole year let alone 6 months.

    Let's check your original post...
    There weren't any prequalifiers...
     
    #183     Feb 28, 2007
  4. While you goomba's were high fiving each other and giving each other the "reach around", you missed the YM tip its hand based on its current down channel. Sold 25 lot at 11:38:09 at 141500. Got confirmation that I was on the right side by the 11:40 YM bar. Currently still short as the LTL is being breached on greater PRV. Market currently at 140775.
     
    #184     Feb 28, 2007
  5. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    The conclusion as stated on page 1 is hereby proven after some 38 pages of polite discussion:

    "So that leaves the two permanently at odds."

    Moderator you may now close this thread. Thank you.
     
    #185     Feb 28, 2007
  6. The plaintiffs rests its case. The defendents rests its case.
     
    #186     Feb 28, 2007
  7. Out at 12:08:21 at 140725. 25 lot for 7.75 pts. You guys can do math right. Man this is an awesome last 2 days!!

     
    #187     Feb 28, 2007
  8. virgin

    virgin

    Harold,



    If you would have posted that real-time ..........................................................................................
     
    #188     Feb 28, 2007
  9. Wow, you are the shit Harold
     
    #189     Feb 28, 2007
  10. you banged out a winner and told us about it. Self esteem problems?
     
    #190     Feb 28, 2007