BE DO HAVE and Jack Hershey vs Objective Reality

Discussion in 'Chit Chat' started by ^^^^^^, Feb 26, 2007.

  1. eek!
     
    #171     Feb 28, 2007
  2. Oh, then just give me a pointer to the title. It should still be there on Amazon.
     
    #172     Feb 28, 2007
  3. this is getting interest, Hershey could end this right now if he wanted to. But i doubt it will happen.
     
    #173     Feb 28, 2007
  4. Chicken Little??? Only you would remember a detail like this, and of course fail to note the "V" alone...

    "You should see my other one"
    -Batman
     
    #174     Feb 28, 2007
  5. virgin

    virgin

    #175     Feb 28, 2007
  6. You guys are right, channels and PV and all the other tools DO NOT WORK. You should continue with your entry/exit strategy and your small handful of trades a day. Its MUCH better than what I am doing. I suggest you all go back to the market and forget you ever heard of Jack and Spyder and the rest. You guys were right, you're method is bar none the best around. You are all the best traders too. No one else out there can possibly be milking the S&P on a daily basis. Its just not possible. I mean, how can it be, right?

    You'll all sleep much better tonight knowing you were right. You all win!!
     
    #176     Feb 28, 2007
  7. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    I know 666 will post this link eventually:p any casual observer will know that the result (several years old) was flaw to the core, the result poster, Tumul, was just a bundle mess, I hope he got some psychiatrist help :)
     
    #177     Feb 28, 2007
  8. "you are completely wrong here. we do NOT claim."

    Exactly the point. Outlandish (really outlandish) claims of profitablity without any documentation deserve the whole board's disgust. Only a rank amateur would fall for this.
     
    #178     Feb 28, 2007
  9. Apparently your ivy league education (if you really have one) was a total waste of money... a six month period with only 111 trades is meaningless. Not to mention that Spydie didn't even say what, specifically, he posted the results for.

    Compare that to my backtest of buying the 0 to 7 turn of the "P,V Boolean relation." Approximately 24,000 trades in 1000 stocks over a 5 year period. Plus I cite the specific claim that was backtested in Jack's own publication, so anyone can replicate it. See this post and the one immediately after it:

    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1278985#post1278985

    So who's full of %#^@ here? The answer is obvious to anyone who's not a member of the first internet church of grob109.

     
    #179     Feb 28, 2007
  10. ^^^^^^

    ^^^^^^

    A search for makosgu as author and FORWARD TEST as the text brought up a few hits and posted the one I thought was relevant. If you are referring to a different forward test you performed which showed a profit AFTER execution costs and you are intent on bragging about it you should either post a link to it or shut up and quit promoting it vaguely.
     
    #180     Feb 28, 2007