BBC WTC7 smoking gun... BBC jumps gun on reporting WTC7 collapse@!!!

Jesus

 

"

* 149.
* At 10:07 PM on 27 Feb 2007,
* Jayhawk wrote:

I downloaded the whole 40 minute segment myself this morning. I can lend it to you if you like. Don't tape over it this time"


ROFL

 

"Let's say for a second that you messed up and reported a building going down that didn't - why the exact one that DID? What are the odds? Why not by mistake report a building going down that DIDN'T actually go down?"

from same webblog comments

 

maybe the same reason this guy reported it too?

http://rattube.com/blog1/2007/02/28/another-bbc-psychic-news-call-on-wtc7/

 

http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html

Deputy Chief Peter Hayden
Division 1 - 33 years

...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse.

Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away?
Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html


Maybe they were listening to police/fire radio scanners and got it wrong - just as plausible, right ?

 

damn, after looking into this more extensively, now I see what the argument is all about...

shit..

 

Does anyone NOT find it strange that only the buildings owned by Silverstein managed to fall??

 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jPDNPJAr_Ao&mode=related&search=

 

here is a govt shill acting like johnny on the spot. what is amazing is how scripted he sounds..... and even more curious is how he got the govt spin/story so early? is this haroki? courtesy of fox...LOL LOL LOL....:eek:

http://rattube.com/blog1/2007/02/11/911-propaganda-101/