No. What you don’t get is that Robert Mueller can read and write. He read Barr’s stupid memo and said this is a bunch of horse shit and wrote Barr a little letter telling him so. See, it’s all about reading and writing. Next stop, Horowitz for Mr. Barr. As to Rosenstein, he’s been a friend to Trump regardless of what you say.
DEMS AND LIBERAL MEDIA SEEMINGLY IGNORE CRUCIAL DETAIL IN MUELLER’S LETTER TO BARR The Washington Post report explained: When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said. In their call, Barr also took issue with Mueller calling his memo a “summary,” saying he had never intended to summarize the voluminous report, but instead provide an account of its top conclusions, officials said. Justice Department officials said that, in some ways, the phone conversation was more cordial than the letter that preceded it, but that the two men did express some differences of opinion about how to proceed. https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/30/mueller-letter-barr-detail/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...82d3f3d96d5_story.html?utm_term=.b1c81f15a7e7
Completely wrong as usual. Mueller's objection to the Barr's summary of the findings was that the press was running in the wrong direction with it in a number of areas and it was not sufficient to quell that. Not that what Barr had written was incorrect or lied on any point. Mueller wanted him to go ahead and release a full summary of the report versus Barr's position that he was just going to submit a summary of findings and then let the report speak for itself. No crime there. He simply refused to pander to Mueller's concern that the press was having a picnic making stuff up until the full report was released. BILL BARR IS DOING A GREAT JOB!!!!
Let the viewers read the third paragraph in it. Just as I said. Mueller did not question the accuracy or truthfulness of what Barr wrote and in fact had discussed it with Barr. Mueller was miffed because the press was running in uncontrollable directions with it and wanted him to produce more summary information to satisfy them- which Barr was unwilling to do because he was just about to release the whole report making summaries moot. I just completely repeated what I said before. Let the viewers decide.
So to the point DOJ put out about Mueller being concerned with the media, that is not what the letter states. The letter clearly puts public confusion of the findings squarely on the shoulders of Barr, not the media. Now Barr, who may be lying and may not be, is saying Mueller wanted more info out. Again, no. Mueller wanted his summaries and releases out. His explanations, not Barr’s.
Yes. Mueller wanted more of the report out and for it to be released asap. "More" however, is different than saying that he did not agree with what had already been released. As discussed twice though, Barr, said no to releasing that because he was just days away from releasing the whole report so summaries would be moot. Did I not say that twice? And lest you lefties forget, Mueller's job was to do the report unfettered and that happened. Barr, however, is the AG and Mueller reported to him and Mueller decides whether the full report would be released in a few days or whether he has to release more of Muellers stuff before then. Barr's call, not Muellers, and no criminality involved in doing his job as AG. Barr made it very clear in his testimony that although Mueller wanted more summary material released that he was about to release the full report and did not want to get into dealing with even more discussion about whether those summaries were complete or not. Sorry Charlie. Barr is not Jeff Sessions. He is running the DOJ. Barr is doing a great job.
For there to be obstruction of justice, there would first and foremost need to be an actual crime being looked at. --There was none---
The report should have just been one paragraph------"We have found no evidence of collusion (which is not a crime anyway)".
Also, isn't Joe Biden engaging in collusion when he says he's talked to leaders of other countries and they have asked him to run and they will support him?------