no jitters here, just your perception perhaps... i dare question jews, blacks, theists, whites, pinks, gays, straights and pretty much anything i can think of personally... just not interested in general rants going all over the place, that's all... ciao ciao
Serious hate stuff? Bwaaahaaahaaahaaaa..... Too funny.... Now the repugniklans are placing grades on hate stuff... Of course, they think Coulter's comments about converting them or killing them is humor "not serious hate stuff."
"Aren't there at least one or two other names you've been banned with????" I don't pay attention or keep score, that's what the ET klones and stalkers are for...
ROTFLMAO!!! The ZTroll says he doesn't keep track of how many times he's been banned for unethical or child-like behaviour!! Gotta love it. Profile For ZZZzzzzzzz Date Registered: 06-14-04 Total Posts: 32764 (30.39 posts per day for almost 3 years folks!!!! Does Z have any friends or a social circle of any kind?) btw Z.. I asked you earlier why you were banned under the username Optional777, but you didn't reply... can you give us an answer? We would be interested in hearing the story! ----------------------------------------------------------- Member of the ET Anti-Troll Brigade iustus ignarus troll
Did I say they were banned for saying "fucking" Jews? Your implied that much in your previous post. Master of reading into things and seeing implications that serve his own agenda, that's dddooo... Why not just try dealing with what is written for a change instead of applying your fantasy life to what others post...oh yeah, if you do that you have nothing to say. I have seen consistent bashing of Muslims in these forums, and those who have done the bashing continue on their merry little way... Random sentences and occasional posts blaming muslims (or jews or christians or hindus) for something as part of a relevant political/religious discussion is one thing, a deliberate campaign by a few rogue individuals to hijack this site and turn it into a mouthpiece of the Nazis or any other fringe fanatical organization is a totally different thing. Do you really not understand the difference or are you deliberately trying to obfuscate it? You don't have to answer though as I am not quite sure which is worse. You claim that there has not been consistent bashing of Muslims following 9/11...Okay Mr. Ostrich... This is not a republic that defends the minority voice, this is a Kingdom, with Baron as the King I don't remember disputing this. And the King has every right not to let HIS site be hijacked by extremists (or whoever else). Kings of all responsible political websites and blogs ban nazis, racists and trolls. I realize you would not. Baron/Joe exercised their rights only after multiple whining and complaining of ET members who could not handle what was being posted...but I seriously doubt that most of the complainers have ever complained about hate speech found in any thread directed toward Muslims, Mexicans, Hindus, Socialists, Communists, etc. Why not just admit the double standard and move on with your life? Muslim, or Hindu, or any other group that was not represented here in any great number would have little chance of sufficient complaints the way that the majority groups can. Nevertheless if I started writing 10-15 anti-muslim or anti-hindu threads a day, threads full of lies, conspiracies and hatred - I'd still be banned in no time (or at least I hope I would). If I started writing racist anti-black,anti-latino hateful threads copying and pasting from KKK and white power websites I'd be immediately banned even though the black/hispanic representation on ET is negligible. 1 murder, 2 murders, 10 murders, 15 murders...all murders. Again, face it, those who didn't like the content could have complained at the very first one, or they could have skipped over any thread started by Publisher. This is not about ET principles or anything of the kind, this is about ET politics, nothing more. Please tell me why people who didn't like the posts of Publisher kept on reading them? Same reason people who don't like pornography continue to search the web so they can find it and say "Oh, how horrible, I will complain." It is all about control, trying to control what others do, and trying to shut down what others are posting. If you don't like it, just don't read it, especially if you know what it is going to be about. But, then it still gets posted if you don't try to control the poster or what they post...talk about control issues. I read saw no thread that demonized Jews. More dramatic verbiage from a fanatic. Really? Publisher and Co were in essence rehashing the Protocols, accusing the Jews of controlling this country, the media, the world economy, blaming the Jews for the war in Iraq, communism in Russia, Nazism in Germany etc. Of course that's not demonizing, that's just "more dramatic verbiage". [/B] Maybe Jews do control this country, maybe they are responsible for the war in Iraq, communism, Russia, Nazism in Germany. I don't find that dramatic verbiage at all, any more than I find the constant bashing of Muslims and Arabs being read around here. If the threads of Publisher were demonizing, then so were the comments about Muslims, etc.
I understand what you're getting at, but perhaps you should consider a few things: A) The Nazis were masters of misinformation & propaganda. For example; Death camps and gas chambers were benignly labeled 'Labor camps and de-lousing showers'. Back then, the truth was just too horrible for most people to believe. B) Boiling Frog Syndrome affects <b>all</b> peoples, Jews included. Hitler took great care to implement his 'Final Solution' in a gradual, patient, meticulous and un-rushed manner. C) One of Hitler's first moves was to <b>confiscate all firearms</b> from his intended victims, who were very poorly armed to begin with. D) After being gradually and systematically beaten down, repressed and starved for years, a quick death would come as a <b>relief</b> to most people- yourself included, quite possibly. 'Don't judge until you've walked a mile in their shoes...' E) Despite A, B, C and D above; Many Jews <b>did</b> put up brave and fierce (yet futile) resistance efforts. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_ghetto_uprising http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghetto_Uprising http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zydowska_Organizacja_Bojowa
Nazi Gun Control is a myth. Here is a "politically correct" site exposing it. http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcnazimyth.html Publisher never posted conspiracy theories. He merely posted about the huge amount of influence Zionists have in the United States. Even the âWashington Postâ said that 60 percent of the contributions for the Republican Party come from Jewish sources. Plus, if any politician in America dares to criticize Israel, millions will go to his opponents and he will be attacked in the media where Zionists have incredible power. Are you trying to say that everyone who talks about Jewish power is to be labeled a conspiracy theorist? If Publisher is to be labeled a conspiracy theorist than Walt and Mearsheimer must be labeled likewise, for they have precisely repeated most of his arguments. Revisionism is the same deal. It's (very) controversial research, but it has nothing to do with CT's. Perhaps 3% of his posts contained what could be defined as hate towards Jews, but that's nothing compared to the attacks committed by other forum members on other groups. The fact is that there is no truly hidden conspiracy. The pursuit of their Israeli/Zionist agenda by formidable Jewish extremists in America is an obvious fact of life. It is brazen. Who were the advocates of the Iraq War? Who are they that want to compound the disaster of the Iraq War with a new and bigger war with Iran?
1) In 2003 most Jews supported the war, but this is irrelevant. 2) Jewish Supremacists in the government argued for war with Iraq since 1996 and they are responsible for that war. It doesn't matter whether the avarage American Jew was opposed to it or not. Below are 3 scholarly articles that show for whom the war was fought. There are many more including books written on the subject, but I think these articles are enough to prove that Iraq was a war for Israel. Read them for yourself and see if they contain lies. http://ipsnews.net/interna.asp?idnews=23083 http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_oilwar.htm http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=6142 Also see: http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol4no2/km-understandIII.html
Back in 1996, long before the current push for war, a prominent Zionist group led by Richard Perle wrote a report titled: A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. (http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm) It called for war on Iraq. It was written not for the United States but for the incoming Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu. The report basically argues how destruction of Iraq will protect Israelâs monopoly of nuclear weapons and give Israel a free hand to defeat the Palestinians and impose whatever colonial settlement Israel has in store. The major promoters of the Iraq War were Neoconservatives such as Wolfowitz, Perle, Wurmser, Feith, Kristol, Abrams, Frum, Podhoretz, and a host of other radically Jewish individuals and a few Gentiles thrown in for good measure. They are overwhelmingly Zionist Jews who have a long history of devotion to the radical Likud Party and to Israel above all else. They were the primary formulators and advocates of this war. And it is only the fact of massive Jewish, pro-Israel media in America that made their false claims against Iraq fly. The rest of the world was not fooled, but then the rest of the world, except perhaps Britain, does not have a media so dominated by Jewish extremists. It has been revealed that much of the false evidence to justify the war was supplied by Israel. Even the man in charge of the American intelligence of evidence for war was Stuart Cohen, a rabid Israel-Firster.