Baron - Is Nazism a fun joke for you and ET?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Bruto Blukowski, Apr 2, 2007.

  1. man

    man

    finally, my point on the stabbed in the back theory is, that
    hindenburg and ludendorff would have send a division back
    asking the socialists what their problem was - if by any means
    they had been truly "undefeated".
     
    #31     Apr 4, 2007
  2. man

    man

    sorry, came over me. i'd better stop it ... :)
     
    #32     Apr 4, 2007
  3. BSAM

    BSAM

    (The dude doesn't believe in free speech, so he's going to North Korea to be around others who think like he does. In North Korea, he will not have to be annoyed by people who exercise their right to speak what is on their minds.)

    Hope this helps. Sleep well.
     
    #33     Apr 4, 2007
  4. man

    man

    ah ... i got that part ... :)

    sleep well too.
     
    #34     Apr 4, 2007
  5. Tolerance cannot tolerate intolerance. This is a truth I find hard to tolerate. Guess im intolerant. In politics & religion I think everything should be tolerated.
     
    #35     Apr 4, 2007
  6. Bsulli

    Bsulli

    I've seen a lot of threads that should of been moved from various forums on ET to chitchat but I've never seen one that should be moved from feedback to chitchat!
    :D
     
    #36     Apr 4, 2007
  7. man

    man

    the important thing is that bannig revisionism does not
    mean to tolerate stalinism. if someone entered here
    and said stalin was a super nice guy and killed no one
    and so forth the effect would probably be the same. this
    guy would get banned. yet, the funny thing is that
    hardly anyone would believe stalin was nice guy in the
    first place. or take the korean guy and start a thread
    praising his deeds and how badly he is treated.

    if i fell over a thread that starts with: "proof that blacks
    are stupid" and the author would come up with topics
    alike i would try to get him banned.

    posts like yours tend to imprint the myth that holocaust
    is seen as bad while every other massmurder or
    racial injustice is not. and this is simply not the case.
    and there are many posters who offer some antisemitism
    here and there. as well as people do with blacks. no
    big deal. just, this revisionist thing got obviously out
    of hand last week.
     
    #37     Apr 4, 2007
  8. reading some of the posts here, i guess the only way yanks can understand "genocide" - ie what happened to jews, armenians and dozens of other human groups over the ages - is if it happens to them... no wonder bin laden gets so much support in a way... sad but, if there is no other way, after all... am sure he is even getting support from some jewish groups :))))))) here they are again, 'em bastidz!!!

    in any event, fuck freedom of idiocy, at least on elitetrader plse baron... time to start banning the morons more aggressively honestly... whats to lose for ET? a couple %... not even... if quality improves, advertisers will be happy to pay more per "qualified" viewer... at the mo' any idiot under the sun can post on ET... whats the value??
     
    #38     Apr 4, 2007
  9. here's a view... humor (attempts) aside, i think all the racist, sexist, uber-conspiracist and revisionist cunts lurking on this forum shld be banned at the 1st opportunity


    wow, pretty good clean-up job baron! a big cheers
     
    #39     Apr 4, 2007
  10. Tiraille

    Tiraille Guest


    There are dozens of threads all over this forum that attack Blacks, Indians, Muslims, Mexicans, etc... It's equally easy to find threads full of posters trying to justify slavery. Now, is this wrong to tolerate? I don't think so. Freedom of speech should always be tolerated as the strongest arguments will always come out on top. I don't see any problem with posters being attacked for holding an extreme world view. If you want to be controversial, then expect to be attacked on it.

    What is morally injustifiable is the banning of members who never attacked Jews as a race, but rather criticised the religion. These people are slandered as Nazis simply for having an opinion that is different. No one is asking the leadership of this forum to become a revisionist or to develop any sympathy for the Nazis or any other group. I don't see any topics on the forum where "Heil Hitler" is shouted, so I think it's wrong to categorize revisionists as Nazis. Do you know that there are several Jewish revisionists? Michael Hoffman II, who might have contributed more to revisionism than Ernst Zundel or Irving ever have, is one of them.
     
    #40     Apr 4, 2007