Baron - Is Nazism a fun joke for you and ET?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Bruto Blukowski, Apr 2, 2007.

  1. Anti-semitic comments are a regular event on this site, they are made every single day, in fact many times a day. You've made your share of anti-semitic comments, so have Wael and many, many others. While that was noted, no one ever complained and asked to have you or others banned. What publisher was doing was completely different.

    Personally I would apply stricter standards than Baron, but this is his site and this is his judgment.
     
    #241     Apr 8, 2007
  2. "You've made your share of anti-semitic comments."

    I have not made anti-Semitic comments, that is your delusion.

    Taking issue with some actions of some Jews, taking issue with Israel's foreign and/or domesitic policy is not anti-Semitic...

    "No one ever complained and asked to have you or others banned."

    You have factual data to support that claim, that no one ever complained or ask to have you or others banned?

    More uneducated guessing from triple DO...

     
    #242     Apr 8, 2007

  3. THIS IS THE MOST ASSANINE COMMENT IN THE HISTORY OF ET. BARON, PLEASE BAN THIS YELLOW BELLY SON OF A BITCH.

    William Rennick USN ret.:mad:
     
    #243     Apr 8, 2007
  4. WOW!! This was the best Z10 post ever and one the best I've read on ET. Good job Z, your Stock just went up on my screen.

    Rennick out:cool:
     
    #244     Apr 8, 2007
  5. I have not made anti-Semitic comments, that is your delusion.
    It's irrelevant whether you find a comment anti-semitic. If your comment insults the jews then it is. And you've made a number of comments straight from the Protocols. Here is an example from this very thread:
    You have factual data to support that claim, that no one ever complained or ask to have you or others banned?
    I doubt anyone has ever asked to have you banned on the grounds of anti-semitism. The fact is you're still here, Publisher is not.
     
    #245     Apr 8, 2007
  6. I have not made anti-Semitic comments, that is your delusion.
    It's irrelevant whether you find a comment anti-semitic. If your comment insults the jews then it is. And you've made a number of comments straight from the Protocols. Here is an example from this very thread:


    Maybe Jews do control this country, maybe they are responsible for the war in Iraq, communism, Russia, Nazism in Germany.

    Maybe they do, I don't know. Do you even understand the what the word "maybe" means?

    Entertaining a logical possibility intellectually is not antisemitism.

    More fundamentalist black and white fanaticism from triple DO...

    Your claims of antisemitism are of course complete BS. You don't speak for all Jews, and you are not the arbiter of what is or is not anti-Semitic.

    If I were to say I like most spiritually oriented non secular Jews who actually want peace but find fanatical Zionist neocon militant reactive knee-jerk thinking Jews that post here at ET completely useless, even that is not anti-Semitic.

    Speaking out against Israel's actions is not not speaking out against all Jews. There are fundamentalist Jews worldwide who speak out against the actions of the Zionists.



    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jews+against+israel&btnG=Google+Search

    http://www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&safe=off&q=jews+against+zionism&btnG=Search

    Just more of your "if you are not with us you are against us" crap. Get a grip.


    You have factual data to support that claim, that no one ever complained or ask to have you or others banned?
    I doubt anyone has ever asked to have you banned on the grounds of anti-semitism. The fact is you're still here, Publisher is not.

    Another non answer fallacious response. You have no facts to support your claims, just more talking out your tailbone...
     
    #246     Apr 8, 2007
  7. Of course I don't, it's a matter of personal judgment, it's all subjective. So let your quotes from this thread speak for themselves:

    and:

    Nice Z10, way to go! Jews are responsible for communism, Iraq and Nazism, Jews "manipulate the psychology of Americans". Oh but this is not anti-semitism, of course not. It's merely academic intellectual curiosity and your best friend is jewish.

    Speaking out against Israel's actions is not not speaking out against all Jews.
    Speaking out against Israel's actions while never speaking out against far worse actions of other countries including Israel's enemies is usually a sign of antisemitism.
     
    #247     Apr 8, 2007
  8. Of course I don't, it's a matter of personal judgment

    Yes, your own opinion, not a fact.



    Nice Z10, way to go! Jews are responsible for communism, Iraq and Nazism, Jews "manipulate the psychology of Americans."

    Do you fail to understand the word maybe?

    Sure seems like it.

    You are denying that many Jews do employ guilt over the Holocaust as a means to manipulate people to get what they want through the practice of guilting people?

    Many people in this country are so brainwashed to a particular Pavlovian response that they don't even want to evaluate a situation factually, a sure sign of brainwashing...

    Oh but this is not anti-semitism, of course not. It's merely academic intellectual curiosity and your best friend is jewish.

    Maybe my best friend is Jewish, you don't know. Maybe I am Jewish, or part Jewish, you don't know. Try sticking to facts for a change.

    Yes, it is merely intellectual curiosity, try it sometime.

    It helps when trying to find the truth of a situation, but of course you have to put your fanaticism to sleep first.

    Speaking out against Israel's actions is not not speaking out against all Jews.

    Speaking out against Israel's actions while never speaking out against far worse actions of other countries including Israel's enemies is usually a sign of antisemitism.

    Complete logical fallacy. You of course ignored the fact (the links I posted) that clearly demonstrate there are Jews who are very against Israel's actions and opposed to Zionism.
     
    #248     Apr 8, 2007
  9. Do you fail to understand the word maybe?...Yes, it is merely intellectual curiosity, try it sometime.
    So if someone were to say "maybe blacks are subhumans..." because of the word "maybe" the person is suddenly not a racist but an intellectual and a researcher trying to solve a serious scientific problem? Give me a break Z10, you can't hide behind the word "maybe", it does not conceal your antisemitic views, it instead shows your intellectual dishonesty and cowardice.


    You are denying that many Jews do employ guilt over the Holocaust as a means to manipulate people to get what they want through the practice of guilting people?
    Here you go again.
     
    #249     Apr 9, 2007
  10. Do you fail to understand the word maybe?...Yes, it is merely intellectual curiosity, try it sometime.

    So if someone were to say "maybe blacks are subhumans..." because of the word "maybe" the person is suddenly not a racist but an intellectual and a researcher trying to solve a serious scientific problem? Give me a break Z10, you can't hide behind the word "maybe", it does not conceal your antisemitic views, it instead shows your intellectual dishonesty and cowardice.

    Name calling, best you can do?

    Strawman argument comparing the willful actions of Israel and or some of the Jews there to a scientific condition of being something less than human.

    Again, Fox News is waiting for you....

    You are denying that many Jews do employ guilt over the Holocaust as a means to manipulate people to get what they want through the practice of guilting people?

    Here you go again.

    Non responsive.
     
    #250     Apr 9, 2007