It looks like i have to actaully spell out why some people dont understand Jack. What he writes are posts with a LOT of substansive content. Stuff with a LOT of substansive content needs to be read multiple times. Let me give you an example: I am an Economics major from the Universtiy of Pennsylvania. Economic textbooks(university level) are books with a lot of substanisve content. You have to read each page multiple times. The reason being that the first time around you only understand the logic of the first paragraph.Somewhere along the rest of the page you missed one thing. That one thing leads you too not understand the rest of the page. This is why you have to read it MULTIPLE times before you understand the whole page very well. Jack has already stated numerous times that he has written several textbooks. Textbooks contain things with a lot of substansive content that needs to be read multiuple times to fully understand. People here who dont like him dont know if he is or isnt a good trader. They just dont understand him. What this means are the people who dont understand him are not reading enough times and grasping what he sais. People who do not grasp things at the university level fail and recieve D's and F's. What is happening here is that we have a majority of the forum falling into the D's and F's. This makes sense as the majority of traders here are small time traders and not profitable. We know this from previous polls done on ET. *****so here we are now with the IDIOTS banning Jack. They ban Jack becasue they could not understand him. They dont understand him becasue they are either stupid or did not put in the work. And so they Ban. Does that seems like a fair basis too ban somone in ET? NO.NO.NO.NO.
Baron, You're a real class act. Thanks for making clear what the standard is for membership around here. TrendFighter and your boy InWithaHardOn are shining examples of what ET is all about. P.S. For the dummies who have a hard time understanding, this is called sarcasm.
Banning Jack has to be one of the stupidest things ET could do. He gets hounded and flamed by a bunch of yahoos and responds in frustration and self-defense...and HE gets banned. Really unbelievable. Jack has a loyal following here and lots of others hanging on out of curiosity. Jack's threads are some of the most active. So, this is ET cutting off it's nose to spite it's face. Did Baron look into the source of complaints? I'm not in Jack's fan club, but I find this absolutely mind-boggling. g
you meant "substantive"? :eek: Well, if so.... I was having a heck of a time finding substance. Almost needed new contacts after reading his "stuff"! But, yeah... I also think you gotta be careful about kicking guys off a public trading site... and have a consistent reason/policy in said decision(s). ICe p.s looks like I filled on a position trade.... better get back to work. Bonne chance Heshey-ites
SHUT THE FUCK UP LOSERS ! SUCH FUCKING BABIES ! YOU CALL YOURSELVES GUYS ? I DOUBT THAT. YOU ARE A BUNCH OF BOYS.... MOMMAS BOYS. WAAAAAAH WAAAAAH WWAAAAAH CRY CRY CRY WHY THIS WHY THAT. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND TRADE YOU LITTLE PANSIES ! I WOULD HAVE SAID THIS ALOT EARLIER BUT SINCE YOU WERE GOING AT IT WITH MY NOT SO GOOD FRIEND INANDLONG I LET YOU GO. BUT ENOUGH FOOLS, SUCK ON A PACIFIER , LITTLE GIRLS
i was able to obtain a list of the member names that asked for jack to be banned. it's a curious list isn't it? inandshort inandeven inandnotin inandout trendfighter trendtrader trendhitter trendbiter and no, jack was not being a distraction until two people decided to start attacking him in his own thread and started the mudslinging. before that, it was pretty much a trading strategy thread with a log, with some people posting their trades...nothing more than that.
Or is it because so many people love Jack? Personally, I have no opinion on the matter, but I do find it amazing that so many people are more interested in posting/bashing today instead of trading Ahhhhhhhh, can't beat the summer blues !!!!!!!! Vega
dawg, Mike has to be one of the biggest losers I've ever seen. You're trying to make sense out of something that has nothing to do with the reality of the situation. Mike has serious problems, but you're not going to fix anything by arguing with him. Just look at the history of his posts. g