Barack Hussein O. was the first president in US history to not have even one year of at least 3% GDP growth.
Given the shitshow he was handed by conservative intellectual Dubya (a -8% rate), to see you Cons whine about not seeing 3% rates is hilarious. Why isn't your cult taking credit for slowing job market though? Doesn't fit the narrative? And no comments on 'conservative moral character' of Trump after he was shown that he tries to fuck his own friend's wives or is that part of some conservative moral code that i am unaware of?
Because there is no slowing job growth for substantial jobs. Under BHO, the rules were changed to show jobs at 30 hours as "full time" jobs when in fact people were having to get two jobs to survive. Thus, there were more jobs created--- but not really.
And that rule was changed back under Trump? Source? Oh, it's different for Trump, job numbers were fake news then but the exact same numbers are true for the retard messiah. The hypocrisy, it bleeds. And still no comment on conservative moral principle of trying to fuck your friend's wives or is it too commonplace among you guys to even discuss?
I didn't change shit,I pointed out the fallacy in your argument - if Obama changed those numbers to make them look good and Trump hasn't changed it back then what difference does it make at all? Both numbers are using the same criteria, you tried to pretend that the numbers are bad because Trump changed it which is obviously not the case. Critical thinking, try it.
No.The criteria are not the same. The Hussein administration cooked the books on full time employment when it was really part time. That is not how it is calculated now. The Hussein numbers are faux. Noone said YOU changed anything.
Great. show me a source where it shows that Trump admin has changed the criteria back to it's original. Otherwise admit that Dotard is cooking the books as well and you are faux outrage is just deflection. If both are using the same criteria for job numbers then what exactly is your point other than to change the subject?