What's the problem? Everyday I look for Breakouts, Breakout Pullbacks, Breakout Pullback Failures, Breakout Pullback Failed Failures and Failed Breakout Pullback Failed Failures. It couldn't be easier. ROFLMFAO! BTW, Failed Breakout Failed Pullback Failed Failures that Fail are one of the most reliable trades you can take, unless it fails.
Sometimes failure is a good thing. Unless it fails too many times. Then it's considered the last failure. And those are not good.
read his book several times... watched his webinars... read his articles for futures mag.... listen to his trading room..... what have I learned? I have a long long way to go to understand as much as he does about price action.(just another 20 years) best advice. he suggests to print out daily charts and review it every day for years.
LOL !!!! Are you serious? Are these actual quotes from the book? Well, that just reversed my decision of trying to wade through it. The comments about the writing style are even more brutal on Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Price...?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=0&filterBy=addOneStar
I won't (can't) defend the writing. It is B_R_U_T_A_L! But it is still worth wading through. The more for real a trader is the more it provokes you to come up with some great plays to add to your playbook.
The book is tough to get through, but if you are patient there is some great info in there. The only trading book Ive come across that I would actually recommend. Just do a lot of flipping back from the charts to the explanation, you will have to read each section a few times.
Think the proof of the pudding is in the eating. I also found the book a hard read but if you persist, you can dig up real gems. Try reading Taylor's book , it is a nightmare but boy his methodology is something else, even Linda Raschke and G. Angell had difficulty in figuring it out in its original context and hence made modifications which bear no resemblence to the original. With Al there is a simple way of gauging if he is a genuine trader or not, request for a free access to his trading room on http://www.brookspriceaction.com/portal.php?sid=060ae1119b1d536402ce859450e54aa6 and sit with an open mind and observe.
So what you are suggesting is that just about everything is a setup. Unless it isn't, in which case it wouldn't be. Some people have opined that it is because Al Brooks is "so scientific" that they have difficulty following his text. I beg to differ. Not being able to herd the cats in one's head does not exactly make someone "scientific." In fact, I am more inclined to believe that if Brooks did indeed have a scientific predisposition, then he would be somewhat more systematized in either his approach or his presentation, and preferably both. Instead, he comes across as a misunderstood artiste.