No. What was Podesta subpoenaed for? You guys did the same thing when the uranium one indictment against a Transportation company - that had nothing to do with Clinton - came out. You just grab on to any thread and spin it into the story your crazy little mind wants it to be. It’s nuts. You’re crazy.
I stated that the subpoena was upon documents and employees of Tony Podesta's firm. I don't know exactly who within that firm has actually been subpoenaed. That info might be available I just have not looked into it. But that is how I stated it. It would stand to reason that Tony Podesta would be included because he is the main player there but I can't confirm that. But realistically.........his sudden need to close down the firm would indicate that he feels that he is more within the crosshairs than you think he is.
The firm is not closed down, there is no subpoena. TreeFrogTrader is the biggest liar on the board and that's saying something.
Such as the judge who approved the subpoenas to the Podesta Group. Or are you perhaps referring to the judge who - last week- approved a subpoena for Fusion financial records showing payments and receipts from the shared attorney who worked for both the Podesta Group and the dnc/Hillary campaign. It would appear that their insane minds think that a rational mind has a reason to be looking into that. Oh, and perhaps, after 30 years, Tony Podesta shut down his firm overnight after his name/firm appeared in the indictment for Mannafort just because he saw a mouse in the office and was scared to go back.
You’re jumping from Podesta having a connection to manafort to Clinton having a connection to Russia. No where, anywhere can that be construed. This why you’re either nuts or gullible.
Nope, just like the feds, I am "jumping" from the dnc/Hillary campaign having a connection to the Russians because they paid money which passed from her campaign manager, John Podesta or someone under his control, to the Podesta Group, run by John's brother which went from his firms attorney (who was also Hillary's campaign attorney) to Fusion which ultimately hired KGB agents to help in doing a hit job on Trump. Mannafort is just an incidental player. Tony's connection to mannafort is not necessary to prove the above- or similar- similar. The bank records that the court ordered will show the money trail and it is what it is. Nevertheless, the language in Mannaforts indictment referring to Podesta spooked him bigtime because he knows that mannafort knows the real story on both podesta and the Russian connections and that- because his firm is mentioned in the indictment (not specifically, just says "the two lobbying groups that Mannafort was working with" and Podesta knows he was one) it tipped off Podesta that Mueller knew had talked to Mannafort about Podesta and that could not be good. But as I said, the mannafort thing is incidental. You don't have to go through mannafort to connect Hillary to Russian meddling. Podesta is in the crosshairs. His firms employees and documents have been subpoenaed and undoubtedly already interviewed. Then there is the question of alleged FBI payments for the dossier. The party line response is that the fbi agreed to fund another phase but the dossier story blew up before actual funds transferred. I don't know and don't need to know. The bank records and receipts will show all that when the money laundering is sorted out. And the question of what the fbi wanted out of the deal will come out in the dossier material that allegedly has already been received. Or it will come out through the testimony of the fbi agents who worked with or had knowledge of the fusion deal. They are already scheduled for testimony because the Swampmeiter lost. Congress told him to either cough up the dossier material and the witnesses or they will appoint an independent investigator to do. If they give the full story to Congress, fine, or if they want to plead the fifth, that's fine, and if you can catch them lying that's fine too. As I said, what you say does not matter much. I watch what is actually going on in DC and if you can convince Podestas, Hillary, and others that no one is looking at those issues, then go for it.