BAN semi-automatic weapons

Discussion in 'Politics' started by killthesunshine, Feb 24, 2010.


  1. Understood. Good luck to ya' Captain.
     
    #31     Feb 24, 2010
  2. Wallet

    Wallet

    So I can put 30 rounds quickly into the bad guy with out having to reload.

    This is a ridiculous topic.
     
    #32     Feb 24, 2010
  3. Ricter

    Ricter

    In Canada, if you're charged with so much as uttering a threat they come and take your guns away. You can get them back if and when things are straightened out.

    I guess that's one way of resolving the paradox:

    First guy: Crazy people should not be allowed to have guns!
    Second: How do we know they are crazy?
    First: When they gun down a dozen people, of course.
     
    #33     Feb 24, 2010
  4. Just so happens I'll be at the fights tonight. If you read about some old white guy jumping in the ring...well, it was nice knowin' ya'. :eek: Should be a good time. Not a bad ticket all things considered.
    http://www.oneinamillionboxing.com/events.html
     
    #34     Feb 26, 2010
  5. AUTO RIFLES do we need them that's the question.

    They are DESIGNED to strike multiple targets at long range why does THE GENERAL POP NEED THEM??!!

    why can't you get by with a bolt action?:eek:
     
    #35     Feb 26, 2010
  6. Because it keeps the government semi honest about their lust for power.
     
    #36     Feb 26, 2010
  7. Can't keep the government storm troopers at bay with only a bolt action..
     
    #37     Feb 26, 2010
  8. A big fan of action movies, are you?
     
    #38     Feb 26, 2010
  9. No doubt, you sport an impressive stock of canned beans. However, judging by your continuous stream of brain farts, you may want to stop dipping into your emergency supply.
     
    #39     Feb 26, 2010
  10. you rifle against a tank or an F-22 Raptor? are you serious? ly insane :eek:
     
    #40     Feb 26, 2010