By your reasoning, acquiring a gun causes someone to become a criminal. If that's true, why is that people who own guns legally are LESS likely to commit crimes than the general population? Criminals become criminals long before they acquire guns. A story in the LA Times last year said that in Los Angeles, the typical person arrested for a gun crime had five previous criminal arrests BEFORE they acquired a gun (illegally) and used it in a crime. Your argument that acquiring a gun turns people into criminals is unadulterated nonsense and contrary to all known facts regarding guns, gun crime, and criminal behavior.
And you keep stepping in it. But I digress. What was your answer to this I missed it? "On those extraordinarily rare occasions you do get a date (with a female) do you rummage through her bedroom looking for weapons while she's in the bathroom?"
I know you meant to be facetious but in principle I'm okay with full automatic weapons and anything else I'm willing to purchase. but hey that's just me. PS: I might not be too thrilled to find my neighbor has an unexploded WWI mustard gas artillery shell , but that's another issue.
I guess if my jokes only make me laugh I'll have to live with that. I thought it was funny. Everybody is for arms control and restrictions, the only discussion is what degree we're talkig about.
Starbucks' gun policy draws mixed response http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/01/starbucks-gun-policy-draws-mixed-response/ The Iraqi stores allow full auto.