I feel better now just answered above, I do use same strategy, with the same parameters, on multiple assets except I use 15min, 30min, 60min charts
I just checked, I have about 695 trades with 30 symbols and tested for 18months but the fact is, avg net profit in a given 6months is so diff from -PnL to +PnL as I gave in Original post. so is this a bad strategy to go LIVE and work on tweaking? to get +PnL
1st 6 months $3351 2nd 6 months -$4250 3rd 6months $1452 I havent checked each month. I am usually interested in yearly PnL for any strategy, as I get an average of 12months
here is whole summary of 30 symbols, run in Ninja's strategy optimiser 2 choices 1) choice 1 - 45min chart Total # of Trades : 345 (commission paid $694) % profitable 45.53 % 158 winning trades over 189 avg trade $31.17, total PnL $10,814 2) choice 2 - 12min chart Total # of Trades :1238 (commission paid $2476) % profitable 39.82 % 493 winning trades over 745 avg trade $6.83, total PnL $8454 anyone will say, I love the choice1 , due to its super avg per trade $31/ and due to low # of trades of 45min chart, i can trade more symbols as I am left with more margin !! smart idea ha what do you all think
In the other thread you used 30 trades. State your formula. You know no statistics. This is not coin tossing.
Write down you formula for those claims. Confirmatory statistics do not apply to backtests. You seem not to understand this. Your statistics knowledge is too limited. Only real trades can be used for those tests. By the time you get 600 trades you may be already broke. Do you understand this or you will continue with absurdities? I repeat for you. Statistical testing for hypothetical results makes no sense.