If you pay me money I will show you. Just showing it for free is useless for me. Nobody works for free. Payment should cover for risc of losing my anonimity, risc of reverse engineering my trades, risc of contacting my broker to get info about me or my system.... So the payment should be significantly enough to compensate for the risc I take. Probably you cannot afford that, because the amount should be linked to the performance I will show.
LOL, more excuse. You only need to make live calls with clear SL and PT (the number of the calls that meet the statistical significant) and not even need to explain "why" you make those calls. This actions will not reveal any of your trade secret. There is no difference from you with the the desperate guy that submit a fake CV (or most of the fake trading mentor/guru in internet) that using the fake trade result to woo more followers or look for customers Highly suspicious
The system actually seems to work best when vol is higher. I do hedge my positions so being directionally wrong is not the end of the world. What really kills is being entirely long theta so flat markets or low vol markets screw things up. I also found a reconstructed vxx dataset that goes back to 2004 so I will take a look at that and see if everything holds. Also if anyone has data on Vix futures going back that far as well it would be helpful as well.
Exactly. When somebody can reach this kind of level, they would just scale up, say from 5 contract to 50, 100 or even more (depending on the scalping time interval), they wouldn't have any interest to interact with anyone else and endure the hassles.
Put your money where your mouth is or shut up. The only one trying to find excuses is YOU. I clearly said I will not run away from a bet. We can make a bet that I cannot run up an account from $2500 to $250000 in one year. If I can you lose, if I cannot you win. But not for pocket money, only for substantial money. We are grown up boys, not children. You are a zero, unable to trade, and afraid to back up what you are telling with money. Your mask fell off. Like most bashers you are frustrated. If you are a loser everybody should be a loser. Pathetic we call this. "the number of the calls that meet the statistical significant" means that these numbers are also statistically significant enough to reverse engineering things. And like usual you will find new excuses why it did not succeed even if I would succeed.
LOL, more excuse. A simple few live calls will valid/invalid your claim of your trade record, obviously you won't and can't make it. Talk without any backup is cheap
I would be suspicious of results from a system that assumed I would always get filled at the close price. Of course, how significant that is depends on the duration of your trades. I think it is better to assume you have to give up the edge. You also realize I assume that your system cannot use closing prices to generate a signal and then assume a fill on the close. If you use closing prices, you have to get your fill the next session.
Not sure what is your setup, but if you are back test VXX since 2009, and we all know VXX is in a long term down trend since then, any strategy (such as sell at the pop) that short VXX will be profitable. It is aka you long any US indices using any simple strategy (such as BTFD) since 2009 will be profitable. Market conditions will change in future and your strategy will not work that time.
You are sure it is impossible to make 10% every day. This would result in running $3000 up to $62500. I propose even to run it up to $250000 which is FOUR TIMES what is already impossible according to you. But you are still afraid? Maybe you are not so sure about your own statements anymore? I offer you free money... unless I would really reach $250000 of course, because would that would cost you a lot of money. My proposal was very clear: We can make a bet that I cannot run up an account from $2500 to $250000 in one year. If I can you lose, if I cannot you win. But not for pocket money, only for substantial money. We are grown up boys, not children.
LOL, more excuse to avoid what you claim. If you can show the real time calls with clear SL and PT. Example, if you claim you have the 90% winning trade with risk/reward = 3/9, you only need to show 10 trades with this type performance (without revealing "why" you take the trade and your trade secret), then you can prove what you claim. I am more than happy to link you to the firm that will interest in your "edge". Before any "prelim" solid proof, you are not any difference than any system vendor , fake trading mentor or any trading website that sell signal or system that promise 1000% return in 10 days.