Ayn Rand Forecasts Economic Disaster from Collectivism & Socialism

Discussion in 'Economics' started by startraitor, May 23, 2011.

  1. Gold standard was abandoned in August 1971 with Nixon's reneging on the 1944 Bretton Woods.

    Long before Greenspan. In fact, long before Volcker. Probably long before you.


    But, you and I are in agreement "A" gold standard would be a good idea.
     
    #11     May 24, 2011
  2. MKTrader

    MKTrader

    Right. My point is that Greenspan was a mainstream, establishment type when he was at the Fed. He wasn't a Randian or any other kind of strong laissez faire type. (Or if he was deep down inside, his actions didn't show it.)
     
    #12     May 24, 2011
  3. morganist

    morganist Guest

    I guess it depends on what type of Randian. If you mean economic theory perhaps not. If you mean out for himself and A meaning A or I am alive therefore I can do what I want with out the consideration of the effect of others then yes he was.

    He screwed every person in the world because that is what they do. Remember the idea of self interest and persuit of own goals no matter the consequences is in the objectivist thinking.
     
    #13     May 24, 2011
  4. Crispy

    Crispy

    Greenspan sold his soul to the devil and lost his way. He was not a randian while serving the vile state nor is he one today.

    The pursuit of self interests without violating the personal rights of other humans is what a true objectivist believes. They do not assume to owe or own anybody. His policies while in charge of the fed were destructive and counter intuitive to Rands philosophy.

    Live and let live.
     
    #14     May 24, 2011
  5. morganist

    morganist Guest

    I disagree with that. I think they don't care and even when they claim they care they manipulate people to think the things they do aren't bad.
     
    #15     May 24, 2011
  6. Crispy

    Crispy

    "They" are not objectivists.
     
    #16     May 24, 2011
  7. #17     May 24, 2011
  8. You might disagree with that, but you would be wrong to do so. Objectivism states that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or rational self-interest.

    That doesn't mean at any cost, or at the cost of someone else's happiness.

    If you think you are out to please anyone other than yourself then you are delusional. Humans are all rationally self-interested.
     
    #18     May 24, 2011
  9. MKTrader

    MKTrader

    You're talking about 95%+ of all politicians, though, including all the so-called bleeding hearts.
     
    #19     May 24, 2011
  10. A nice theory, but the devil's in the details, as usual...
     
    #20     May 25, 2011