When you have such a picture, then the accuracy of your trading operations will be with an error of only 1 minute.
If the authors of these works: Kitchin Cycle 3-4 years Juglar Cycle 7-11 years Kuznets Cycle 15-25 years Kondratiev Cycle 45-60years were able to structure the development of volatility in the same way, they would have thrown their books in the trash.
It took me only 9 years to correct the basic mistakes made by Gartley «Profits In The Stock Market» in 1935 and find an algorithm that is responsible for the development of volatility over time.
you can silence any specialist in the field of technical market analysis if you ask him a simple question How exactly to act, for example, in this situation in accordance with candlestick constructions
I'm telling you, that's why I'm interested in talking with professionals and not amateurs who act like everyone else
yes, professionals will take the prior data's construction into accordance to forecast a future observant datum.
For example, fans of fundamental analysis can be asked a simple question: if there are no technologies capable of linking the quotation part of a trading instrument with geopolitics, news background, etc., then how exactly can the price react to this or that news or someone's opinion?
That's why, it only takes me 5 minutes for all your respected traders on this site and those authorities you look up to to fall silent like children and get away from constructive dialogues without even saying goodbye.
Maybe update your mental models. This tech exists and is widely deployed. It couldn’t be that most will just mute the guy who constantly self-aggrandizes and constantly uses ad hominem - maybe it’s a cultural thing. Why is the self-professed misunderstood genius so angry? In the grand scheme of things; we are all fools.