I know XOM goal is to sell expensive energy to every human on the earth. Don't get me started trading that Sugar/Corn spread. Subsidies have been the ruin of many an ag trader.
What a teaming pile of horseshit. Again. You just keep repeating the same horseshit over and over again. NO respected climate scientist denies it. None. The scientist you refer to Salby and Lindzen? Are fools and are of the feeble 1 % of relevant sceintists that deny, and even they don't deny man made global warming. Both are generally considered fools by the science community yet you defend them. Google it. Amazing. Something's fishy in Denmark. The consensus among the experts is closer to 100%, among the publishing climatologists. Why you are such a fool in this one area is a mystery. Unless of course you are working for a think tank for the fossil fuel intersts. Merchant of doubt scum. Can't defend tobacco anymore so you've moved to this. Scum.
You may be some kind of scientist but are a bipolar fool and very wrong about man made global warming. The Hansen hypothesis is called the greenhouse effect. It's happening, and there ARE positive feedbacks occuring. It's true and certainly proven, not in doubt. You are very fucking confused or just fucking lying. And you keep trying to diminish and ad hom the argument calling "hansen's Hypothesis". More deceptive crap from you. No one calls it that. It's called climate modeling and it's certainly proving to be correct. Far from being in a state of confusion ( which doubt merchant scumbags like you of course want to encourage), climate science has never been more sure. That's why no publishing climatologist denies man made global warming and the consensus is near 100%. How much are they paying you to lie? Prick.
Just as a gambler/trader, I would not want to bet on piezoe being wrong on climate science. In my book that would make him wrong on everything, and that would be unlikely.
Something else about piehole's posts about climate change. Where is the science? Never a chart or a link to a respected paper or source. Just a steaming pile of impressive sounding bullshit.
And that's part of their strategy. He is what the think tanks call a Trojan Horse. Win respect, sound reasonable and moderate, and then when he says absurd shit like "Climate science is in a state of confusion" and "Hansen's Hypothesis" is not proving correct", people will believe him. It's a brilliant strategy, especially for a one issue propaganda mission like sowing doubt about global warming. Notice he doesn't deny it, he just sows doubt and that's his mission. See the book "Merchants of Doubt" for more. In their new book, Merchants of Doubt, historians Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway explain how a loose–knit group of high-level scientists, with extensive political connections, ran effective campaigns to mislead the public and deny well-established scientific knowledge over four decades. In seven compelling chapters addressing tobacco, acid rain, the ozone hole, global warming, and DDT, Oreskes and Conway roll back the rug on this dark corner of the American scientific community, showing how the ideology of free market fundamentalism, aided by a too-compliant media, has skewed public understanding of some of the most pressing issues of our era.
By the way, if anyone doesn't believe that there are think tanks doing work on social media to spread doubt about the science of man made global warming, then they are naive and ignorant.