He wasn't prepared for right wing scientists. Climate change scares the shit out of him. Not the warming, the science. He can't hold his own with right wingers who actually are agnostic about it but well read and intelligent in their judgement. They told him we were anti science. All he can do is resort to name calling. All I want is an honest debate. Pick one of those 97% of scientists we hear so much about, put them on a stage in front of a camera and simply ask, Do you believe man made Co2 is causing global warming and if so do you have scientific peer reviewed evidence? And have a fact checker handy. But they won't do that and instead claim the science is settled let's move on no time for debate, catastrophe is just around the corner and we need money.
LOL, the 'well read' right wingers are the same one pushing Seth Rich conspiracies with Kim Dotcom as evidence (actually PROMISING to release evidence), are those the guys I am afraid of? And by the way, what's with the CO2 obsession? You do understand there are other greenhouse gases right with Methane being just as bad? You want peer reviewed studies on climate change, sure. Here you go https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ From NASA's page - http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002 And that's Trump's NASA now, can't blame political influence anymore
Co2 obsession has something to do with carbon tax and the Paris Accord. Give up your obsession with them and I will gladly give up my Co2 obsession and we can just go on peacefully like we were before the big scare.
The climate.nasa.gov website is not run by NASA. It is run by a bunch of graduate students at the University of California. Many NASA employees have been demanding for years that it be taken down - it appears they are about to shortly get their wish. While we are at it... 1350+ Peer-Reviewed Papers Supporting Skeptic Arguments Against ACC/AGW Alarmism http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
How many of those 1350+ think Seth Rich was murdered? That's the real scientific question in a democrats mind.
It's not what they think, it's what they can prove with data or at least negate the possible hypothesis (like in science)
I have looked at that link, most of the papers are not even related to AGW and they are just asking questions and some of them are so old and proven incorrect with time (like the one on top from the 1970s) Secondly, it's NASA's official website, how come Trump is allowing a student body to run it? Which NASA employees have been demanding this take down? Citation needed And by the way EPA has a similar page here https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators Which student body is running them? Why hasn't Pruitt removed those pages if the info is fake?