Doesn't help that each situation is highly fluid, erratic, violent and not at all what humans are meant to be able to process logically in such a short time.
Who had Rice Krispies in the "Cancel Pool"?? Black Lives Matter activist injects race into Kellogg’s cereal packaging Black Lives Matter activist and former U.K. member of Parliament Fiona Onasanya criticized Kellogg’s earlier this week, asking why “three white boys” serve as the mascots of one the company’s signature cereals, Rice Krispies, and a monkey is displayed on boxes of Coco Pops in the United Kingdom, according to the Federalist.
They should quit pulling people over for bullsh*t then. VZ fix #7... with all their automated little toys like license plate scanners etc.... one of these crime vulture companies that makes bank selling all this crap should write some code where a cop can just click a few boxes and said car's owner automatically gets a letter in the mail the next day telling them to fix their headlight or next time they'll get a ticket. They need to quit trolling for trouble. Yeah I knooow. It's about money. So: Fix #8.... all revenue from tickets goes to some community do good operation not in any way associated with the police. Nip that trolling sh*t in the bud. If its a safety thing, see idea #7.
Take things out of context much? There are so very few of these cases we can look at the individually, as should be. Lets take some examples. George Floyd. Open and shut murder by cop, maybe multiple cops. Could also be a premeditated hit considering they had multiple verbal confrontations at their place of employment. That one is easy. Next up, Eric Garner. Similar but not the same as the Atlanta case. Yes, Eric committed a crime, a petty crime, but a crime none the less. He also resisted arrest. This is where the similarity ends. Eric was no real threat, should have been easily handled without using choke hold. His killing was unjust and unlawful. Every cop at that scene should be in a jail cell. Next up, Atlanta. Dude committed a crime. He does nothing and he's now home with his family with a pending court date for DUI. Instead he resists, violently. He proves to be too much for the cops. He manages to take a weapon from a cop. He flees the scene. While the chase ensues he turns, points and fires weapon at cop proving he is willing to do whatever it takes to get away. IOW, now has become a dangerous criminal. Cop shoots him. At this point a completely justified shooting by the cop. If it ends there case closed IMO. Instead cop goes up and kicks wounded and disarmed criminal. Can't do that. Cop guilty of excessive force and assault at that point. Also alleged to have denied medical assistance. If true that's criminal negligence, maybe manslaughter. Every case needs to be thoroughly examined without regarf to what the mob wants or likes. To say this is happening as often as the mob claims is nothing but hyperbole. To take a position that criminals should be allowed to flee unharmed simply because they resist is a horrible precedent to set. Police, when they themselves feel direct threat to their life have the right and obligation to shoot the criminals. Whether or not their life was actually in danger is for a courtroom, not mob justice.
Ha ha......i can list numerous cases of cops randomly stopping Black people and violating their rights but it will not matter to you at all.....because you don't know white from wrong. Amber Ruffin has a few stories to tell The precedent that police can shoot anyone whenever they want is a horrible precedent to set. Philandor Castille.....ohhhh he listened to the officer and was shot... Jeronimo Yanez, the Minnesota police officer who fatally shot Philando Castile during a traffic stop last year, was found not guilty of second-degree manslaughter Friday. He also was acquitted of two counts of intentional discharge of firearm that endangers safety. BUT BUT THE COP HAS THE RIGHT TO SHOOT PEOPLE!!!!! Where the fuck is your argument now about violent resisters of arrest.... A black private investigator captured a tense encounter with the police in a video that shows an officer pointing a gun at his head despite repeated reassurances that both his hands were visible. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...nsettling-video-shows-cop-grabbing-wrist.html BUT BUT A COP SHOULD BE ABLE TO PULL THEIR GUN OUT AT ANY TIME!!!!!!! The jury ruled in favor of the sheriff's department, after Sheppard filed a lawsuit claiming the deputies violated his constitutional rights. WTF? I can spot 2 or 3 violations of Constitutional rights but POLICE SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO WHATEVER THEY WANT. Captain, you are either ignorant of the truth or choosing to close a blind eye. Lucky you are white and you never went through any of these experiences.
Evidently your reading comprehension skills are lacking today. Nowhere did I write police can just shoot anyone whenever they want. There are conditions I listed with every post. You want to defend the criminals. Fine. I do not.