Aubrey McClendon Is Charged With Conspiracy in Oil and Natural Gas Bidding

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by CET, Mar 1, 2016.

  1. Sig

    Sig

    Are you saying I'm not a pilot with over 3000 hours of flight time, or I am but I don't actually know how to fly and your second hand anecdotes from "grizzled veteran commercial pilots" trump my actual first hand experience? I'm confused. Seems I hit the white stripes at the end of the runway every single time that I land. Within +_ a couple feet to either side, and I'm hitting a vertical point as well as a horizontal one. On a visual approach, without computer guidance. As do thousands of other pilots on thousands of other flights every day, even crappy pilots. And I can make a pass at 400 knots exactly over the centerline of the runway, again within a couple feet every time at an altitude again within a couple feet, as could any pilot. (and that pilot would have referred to it in knots, we don't think in mph) Or over any arbitrary point, we actually have to demonstrate the ability to do that in our practical exam and it's a skill you pick up in your first 5 hours of flying. BTW, you display your ignorance again as fly by wire describes the way the controls in the cockpit are linked to the actual aircraft controls, it has nothing to do with guidance precision or any connection to an autopilot which can work equally well with fly by wire or push/pull controls. And the "original flight plan" is completely irrelevant to anything. You may be surprised to find that thousands of flights a day occur with no flight plan at all, but of course you don't actually wouldn't know what a flight plan was if one slapped you in the face.
    I find it hilarious that you began this conversation by accusing me of being full of "Education and book smarts", but then when it turns out I have thousands of hours of actual experience flying aircraft you think your "research" trumps my experience in this area. Again, you know less than nothing about this and have zero credibility to pontificate on it, by your own personal definition that hands on experience trumps book smarts. Sorry my friend, your bubble's been popped and your ideas have been exposed as the frauds they are. If you really believe what you're spouting you belong in an undisclosed bunker somewhere in Montana or receiving help for a mental condition. Either way I feel nothing but sympathy for you and at this point I'm going to stop making you look like a fool because it's just not nice. Good night.
     
    #51     Mar 3, 2016
    bellman likes this.
  2. destriero

    destriero


    http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/PDFfiles/Chapter IV Aircraft Impact.pdf

    Objects have different terminal velocities. Something meant to be aerodynamic, moving at great speed, will have a much greater terminal velocity than something unstable, or unstable and passively accelerating due to standard gravity (9.8m/s^2). The analogy would be the 2x4 penetrating a tree during a tornado. Forget aerodynamics and TV; how about Newton's Second Law?

    Literally hundreds of eyewitness accounts, from INSIDE both WTC towers and on the ground, of commercial jets impacting the towers. The idiocy of the "controlled demolition" is too ludicrous to mention (oops, I mentioned it). Your incredibly moronic BS is profoundly disrespectful to the administration, those that perished in the 9/11 attacks; the families of the victims; those who died trying to save the people in the towers, and those lost in the years following due to inhalation of the dust and debris.

    Why don't you head over to the East Village and talk to some of the guys in Ladder Company 3. I am sure they'd love to hear you spout your theories.

    I'd truly enjoy f****** you up.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2016
    #52     Mar 3, 2016
    bellman likes this.
  3. OMFG What mental defects produce these 911 conspiracy aholes? I watched it happen. It was horrifying. We also had coworkers at the Pentagon who were hurt.

    Chemtrails anyone? How about the "fake" luner landings?
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2016
    #53     Mar 3, 2016
  4. I get it. You guys believe the government report on 9/11. People who don't agree are retarded conspiracy theorists. I get it.

    Realize that this stance puts you in a certain camp and there's no spinning that reality.

    We are who we are.
     
    #54     Mar 3, 2016
  5. newwurldmn

    newwurldmn

    I had friends outside the towers when the planes hit. I had friends across the river watching the planes hit in real life. But it's obvious to me they were all flashed with the men in black memory erasers.

    But it's clear to me that mcleddon was killed by the trilateral commission because he had information that the Rothschild family was driving down the price of oil to destabilize the Saudi government to whom the Vatican was indebted to for several trillion dollars worth of gold.

    Anyone who doesn't believe this is a tool of the government controlled media.
     
    #55     Mar 4, 2016
  6. Two 110-story treated-steel-reinforced skyscrapers were hit by some commercial jets and the fire from the jet fuel eventually caused the buildings to collapse on their own footprint at free-fall speed into fine dust and 5 stories of rubble. The passports of the attackers were found on the scene, undamaged. The fact that no steel-framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire in the history of modern construction, before and after 9/11, has no bearing here, because 9/11 WAS THE EXCEPTION!

    A commercial jumbo jet flew into the Pentagon and killed a bunch (10 - 20) accountants auditing the paper trail of $2.3 Trillion in missing defense spending. The hole was about 5 ft wide and there were no wings or engines found at the scene. The video cameras also happened to be disabled. This investigation had been ongoing for a while, but it had only been announced to the American public by Rumsfeld on September 10, 2001, a day before all the accountants were killed in the attack on the Pentagon, which just happens to be the most protected airspace in the entire world. Fighter jets, anti-aircraft guns and missiles and long-range radar. Gee, the entire security apparatus must have just been snoozing on that one! Stand down orders? Multiple simultaneous exercises meant to obfuscate? Nonsense! Plain old malfunctions is all!

    Four hijacked jumbo jets were able to fly unchallenged into US airspace without being neutralized by NORAD. Coincidentally, there was a massive security drill on the east coast involving multiple agencies gaming the scenario of multiple hijacked planes being used as weapons against US targets. What a coincidence!

    Building 7 wasn't hit by any planes, but it somehow caught fire and then collapsed on it's own footprint at free-fall speed and disintegrated into dust. BBC accidentally reported that Building 7 had collapsed about 20 minutes before the actual event. The building happened to be smoldering in the background during this LIVE erroneous broadcast. How embarrassing! Fortunately, the building collapsed as intended! Relief! It also just so happens that when this building went down it took out evidence contained in the FBI's East Coast HQ relating to federal investigations on JP Morgan relating to their aid of WorldCom and Enron in creating off-balance sheet structures and defrauding global investors out of billions of dollars. Unfortunately, all this evidence and the servers holding it was destroyed when the building went down. What an unlucky break! Oh well!

    After 9/11 there was no investigation. That's so we could ship all the scrap to China ASAP after the event, before anyone could take samples of the debris or search through all of the ruble for additional clues. We already knew who had done it and we had all their identities! Scrap metal was valuable back then you know! Counter-terrorist investigations be damned! We were tracking these guys every. step. of. the. way. But somehow they shook our surveillance a few weeks before the attack and disappeared and then BOOM! We were toast. No warning!

    We received hundreds of documented, recorded and official warnings about terrorist plots involving planes and high-rise buildings within a major population center on the east coast from reputable sources such as foreign intelligence agencies and military, but we totally ignored it because it was just too far-fetched. Then after we were attacked, we all got on camera in front of the American people and told them that there was no warning and NO WAY we could have anticipated people flying planes into buildings. Even though this had been a plot in multiple movies in the years prior, in addition to the official warnings. Go figure!

    All the first-responders dying of cancer and eye-witnesses (who CLAIMED there were bombs being detonated and some of the "jumpers" were hog-tied before falling to their deaths) who ended up killing themselves in freak car accidents and accidentally shooting themselves in the back of the head and jumping off tall structures were just COINCIDENCES. The fact that all of these random people dying in such quick succession when the only think linking them is their invilvement in 9/11 is pure coincidence. Nothing to see here.

    There's more but why should I continue? I could go on for days! It's all out there. Anyone who doesn't believe the official government report is a crazy, looney tunes, gullible and low-IQ IDIOT who has NO common sense and spends all their time dreaming of aliens and crazy conspiracy theories! I mean the tin-foil hat chart is off the meter. Prep the anti-psychotics!
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2016
    #56     Mar 4, 2016
  7. dealmaker

    dealmaker

  8. dealmaker

    dealmaker

    #58     Sep 19, 2016