You are proud , I am humbled I got it , my suspicions were correct. Officially you say, there is no such thing as God. Right, ok, so IF any portion of a "knowledge of G-D" is conceived of in the mind of man, that is most definitely a "no-god". Got that. Hang on a minute. That is a "portion of a knowledge of G-D" "knowledge of G-D" is a "no-god" Now all of a sudden, "Knowledge of G-D" as conceived of in the mind of man in the person of Christ, or the prophets of Israel..... is not a "no-god" ?? . According to you they would most definitely be a "no-god" . Isn't that what you said? Come on Barth, to be taken seriously , you cannot have ISN'T meaning IS at the same time. Conceive G_D in the mind of man as a self revealing God..... and it's a "no-god". Consequence of a self revealing would still inevitably be a "knowledge of G-D" conceived of in the mind of man. And that's a "no-god" ! I think it's fair to say the orthodox theological thinking on this matter seems more in line with me than I with them
this is what stu wrote Quote from jem: It is only the asswipes who make statements which can not be proven. Quote from jem: He can create an evolutionary process that allows species to change and adapt. facts are facts. ------------- Now this is straight out of the elitetrader asswipe bag of tricks. I have no idea what Stu is like in real life. But I do know nothing he writes here can be trusted. Stu makes it looks like Palin's quote was mine. Even though I specifically said her quote carries with it the implicit statement that she believes in God therefore in her belief God could create or allow for evolution.
First I notice you have learned a new word. Someone should let you know using it all the time doesn't help your argument any. It just makes you look like the ignorant crude redneck you clearly are. Second, neither you nor Palin made the statement which can be proven. Palin made a statement , you repeated it and tried to perversely turn the need over to prove the statement wrong , onto those you call atheists. First off according to your own words, neither Palin nor you should be making statements which cannot be proven. Both Palin and you , who repeated the statement and according to your own rules , should not be making those statements which cannot be proven. That is what you said. According to your own unfortunate description, both you and Palin are asswipes. I suggest it's time for both you and your responses to grow up.
hey dipshit, I was making a temporal only argument. I should not expect some uneducated muslim troll to understand I guess, especially when you describe time as an absolute that should have tipped me off that you really don't know anything about physics. Christian scholars tried this sort of crap before. Long after they were rebuked, here comes muslim man trapped in the dark ages and thinking he has some intellectually profound ideas. What a great parody of the entire islamic cult.
"hey dipshit, I was making a temporal only argument." Thanks for the correction, I had no idea I was dealing with a one dimensional thinker...
the problem i have with what you say is that smthg that "resides" is usually considered separate from the place it resides. yet you claim that god is not a separate entity?