Attn: Atheist...read the last line of the first post...

you, sir, are one of those that have no appreciation for reason, scientific method, you do not understand the nature of evidence nor it's importance, you sir are one of those FOOLS

 

Fascinating. I'm struggling to imagine myself watching a movie of, say, 100,000 frames, and seeing only those frames, and leaving the theater perhaps overwhelmed by trying to remember 100,000 frames, and not having seen the story!

 

You have a good heart KTS............not many folks would apply the term "sir" and "fool" to the same person !

 

Aaahahaha, so funny!

 

Please clarify your remarks.......I would like to make sure I understand your point before I reply.

 

So, since scientists haven't yet created smthg that scurried out their beaker when they popped the top you are quite sure it's all due to the benevolent bearded man that lives in the sky. haha

 

I am quite sure that at the end of the day, we both take our beliefs on "faith".

 

Oh, so say you?

So, you see blind faith as efficacious as scientific methodology when it comes to verifiable fact?

 

Well, you attached the term "blind" to "faith".

As I believe in the creation account in Genesis, I also believe that all of what we call "science" is man's viewing of the creation footprint.
I am a firm advocate of "scientific methodology", the problem occurs when the "dogma" of man imprints and holds hostage "scientific methodology" to further the cause of a philosophical replacement for G-D. Science ceases to be so at this point.

Macro-evolution is a theory, nothing more and nothing less, as it cannot be observed or reproduced under the rigor of true "scientific methodology".........therefore it is taken on "faith".

 

Can the "creation account in Genesis" be observed or reproduced? Since DIRECT OBSERVATION by YOU seems to be THE pre-requisite to acceptance of theory?