The January 6th comittee DID NOT suggest removing Donald Trump's Secret Service detail. It is flat wrong to say this. However, Rep. Bennie Thompson, a member of the committee, in his own capacity, introduced legislation known as the DISGRACED Act his bill, introduced in April 2024, has not been enacted yet and has faced criticism from some members of Congress who argue that all former presidents should retain Secret Service protection regardless of their legal status. Of course he has to retain some protection but who can ask a secret service agent to vow to protect a disgraced individual with their very life? It would be better if he was only protected by those who volunteered and if nobody in the secret service was willing, he would have to make his own arrangements. Perhaps Trump was mostly just getting the agents who were volunteering and this is what caused the poor performance at the rally. We will know in time. (https://floridianpress.com/2024/07/...-to-strip-trump-of-secret-service-protection/) [[❞]](https://democrats-homeland.house.go...tion-for-convicted-felons-sentenced-to-prison) [[❞]](https://www.supertalk.fm/thompson-i...p-of-secret-service-protection-if-imprisoned/).
Let's see if NQ gaps by more than the standard 20 pts at the open. Was the gap due to the attempted assaination?
I dont really follow or "invest" in politics the way you do. I dont see return in politics and to be sooo invested in politics makes me wonder... You get highly triggered and spend so much energy on your political views. It gets very old here on a Traders Forum. I used to read your comments regarding trading..but now, I cant even do that
Ok, so by all your definition, a socialist cannot be a fascist. Enlightning. What a foolish bs. Yes - socialists/communists (the party) were totally in confrontation with the NSDAP (Hitler). Does not make them being democratic! They still were dictatoric, still wanted ALL the power; just like in S.U. However, their electorate (!) had no problem swing-voting. They just waited, who will be the ruler (H. or Stalin), to then get under his umbrella... And they had no problem feeling GOOD under Hitler. In addition, they are totally adoptable: They can go with 'we judge by skin colour' as well as 'we are The International'; does not matter, as long as they get their will. Which is a socialistic, everybody is the same, society. Without the right to possess material things/land, and without real indiv. rights. And this is the real threat of socialism. And today, I see the same stuff happening in america, by a large fraction: Socialist powers, gathering together, forming street force, to then storm public buildings, to pursue their opponents, and even, as we saw yesterday, KILL. The reaction we saw during Trumps time in office., AND after it as well! America has a HUGE socialist communist problem, where the colour of your skin always plays a huge role. Which is somewhat strange... Aren't they saying that the skin colour shouldn't play a vital role (?) Same goes for sexual orienatation, and how the average citizen is being harassed with their 'ideas'. Or do you want to call those socialist marxist "protestors" chanting anit semitic, anti american slurs all over the country, educated leftists & non-radicals ? You want to sell me an egg as an apple, as we say... BTW: Don't confuse them with original socialist advocates, that thought for real workers & civil rights, without seeking to change/dictate the society or starting revolutions. The social movement actually has a noble root, but History tells a different evolution; at least when it comes to organized socialism (structural socialism).
Dunning Krueger all over this post. Let the grownups talk, while you watch porn hub and masturbate in your mom's basement.