If we get a bunch of people together, to agree on a set of rules, do they arrive at the truth? LOL! Actually, I don't need to prove the big bang theory false, it has not been proved to be true! It is so full of galaxy sized holes as to be so laughable. While we are on the topic of laughable, how long was Pluto a planet? ROTFLMAO! For a centuries it was a planet because a peer group of "scientists" declared it so, now a new peer group of scientists declare it not so....and we are only talking about our own solar system... What a laugh. Yall "scientists" fuck up a planet, and you think you know the origin of the Universe? Too much....
when you publish your research detailing how the big bang theory is wrong you will be famous. i can see the headlines now. "zzzzzzzzzzzzzz formerly a troll on the websight elite trader is recieving his nobel prize today for his outstanding work in the area of big bang theory. when asked for details on how he proved the theory wrong he simply said "god did it"."
Pluto is a planet! Oh wait. Pluto is not a planet. Never mind.... Hee hee hee hee.... What a kick. If I had said Pluto was not a planet a month ago, the so called "scientists" would be all over my case, with a case of self righteous indignity that anyone dare challenge that Pluto was not a planet. Of course Pluto was a planet, the "scientists" had said so. What a bloody joke...
Idiot. There is a difference between the definition of a word (planet) or a quantity (meter, for example), and the description of a natural phenomenon. Changing the definition of a scientific concept happened numerous times in history. The standard of "meter" was changed at least three times (not counting numerous small refinements). These changes reflect the gradually improved scientific method for measuring a "meter." If you had said that pluto was not a planet a month ago (or even today), without knowing any of the scientific facts why it shouldn't be a planet, then I would say "you're an idiot."
A typical and wrong essay by a typical creationist who is clueless: "Now we have a generation of children being taught in school that they are just accidents of nature and have evolved from algae" Aynyone who has studied evolution or basic biology will tell you that this comment re. people came from algae is laughable at best. S
My observation, as scientific as humanly possible, fully objective and detached, is that you are an idiot. So there. Nya, nya, nya boober... To funny. You clowns are such a source of amusement, as you feign holier than though objectivity, yet act like fundamentalist theists when it is pointed out that yall are just like the so called primitives that you act so condescendingly toward.
4 Classic use of the fundie technique of claiming that an entire science, in this case astronomy, is incorrect because a flaw was found in it. Actually , there is no flaw as scientists determine what is and is not a planet. As the means to observe get better, there comes a time when redefinitions are needed. In the case of Pluto, it was redefined. Get ready, they may make more changes. Using your analogy somewhat incorrectly is like saying the sun still revolves around the sun since scientists are not allowed to change their minds. Seneca ps-I need "Pascal's Wager"; someone please use it. fundie bingo card attached, mine is almost full: