Moonbat prattle. What is unfortunate about you morons, aside from the fact that you use up oxygen that could otherwise go toward something beneficial, is that you fail to understand that your opinions about Bush, his administration, the Iraq war, and all your conspiracy theories don't mean shit. For whatever reason, and you moonbats believe it is because the US is evil, Iran hates my country. Fine. Let's assume that's true, that Bush is Satan incarnate and Iran is a holy country, its people annointed by God, and Ahmadinejad shits pure snow. Doesn't mean squat. What means something is if Iran would use its nuclear ability, most likely by giving a device to a terrorist organization, against the US. I believe it may, and believe that a President of this coutnry cannot risk the deaths of millions of Americans by simply wishing it would not. I know you can't understand this, and probably never will. You are as naive as any of your fellow moonbats.
Before you go to sleep tonight, make sure you look under every bed and in every closet in the house first, check the garage, check the yard...you never know, there may be a terrorist or a communist hiding there just waiting for you to go to sleep... Your irrevocably entrenched fearfulness and hyperbole is truly worthy of some of the talking heads on Fox News...or any of a dozen or more permanently paranoid right wing talk radio show hosts... There is such a thing as reasonable fear, then there is what you obviously are obsessed with...
Err...seem to remember something along the lines of Saddam INVADING, OCCUPYING, AND BRUTALIZING Kuwait. Or did you forget about that? No way he was leaving. He declared it a province of Iraq, and nearly every mideast country supported the US in this move. They left him in power because Papa Bush understood what a mess it would be to occupy. The US military is designed to win battles, not occupy cities as cops. They are sitting ducks when they do that. It never works unless the occupying nation is so ruthless that the opposition just gives up. Think Soviet Union, or even the Romans. They would publicly slaughter civilians as policy to punish any one opposing them.
'Dark Skinned People'? I guess this is no surprise coming from an Arab fundamentalist. The fact that Israelis are also Middle Easterners is conveniently ignored here. I will continue to point out that these extremists are often undereducated, as witnessed by this member's abuse of the language. People might get sick of me stressing the literacy issue, but at some point you have to admit the correlation, seeing as it seems to be almost 1.0 (with a few frightening exceptions). Once again, I do wish you would take the name of our fine city out of your screen name.
I was referring to E Europe after WW II. No one even knows how many civilians Stalin murdered to suppress opposition. As a result, any opposition melted away very quickly. The Soviet Union did not do this in Afghanistan, nor did even the Nazi's do it (very much) in France. Actually, I don't even think ridiculously brutal behavior would work in Muslim countries. They seem ready to meet Allah. Killing hundreds of thousands of civilians would probably just piss em off more. Point is , occupying a country that does not wish to be occupied is extremely difficult. Winning a "war" is the easy part. No one is even in the same game as America when it comes to obliterating an opposing military force. Using this power for offensive policy is just downright stupid however.
The problem here are the religious fanatics on the muslim side. I say we get Cardinal O'conner to call a town meeting where all the towell wrappers are circling that big black box,(mecca or some shit like that) We will send all of our religious whacko's over there to form the other side of the town meeting. Once the crowd gets big enough, Bush hits the button and launches one of our top secret neuton bombs from a submarine near the coast of France. The result should be a million or so vaporized religious assholes, no physical damage to Mecca, and everyone thinking the Frogs did it Damned I should be the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs... Rennick out
attacking iran is wrong, but your argument is. just a few people believed in MWD in iraq, literally nobody doubts about the ambition and possibility for WMD in iran. uncomparable.