LOL, I would have missed those, good stuff, thanks! (But, I have to admit I don't get the atheist cafe one, yet.)
Ummm... Everything is prefaced with the statement "I can't believe..." I get along famously with non-judgemental atheists where you can find them. I'm a bit disappointed with the game shown by PeeDrinker and Gabbie... I miss the U. of Chicago in that respect. Non-judgemental progressives.
ricter in the 70s 80s just about all the pyshco babble created was p.c. --- b.s. it was not tied to realty. and I remember being in college in the 80s... and all of sudden all the women said rape was about power. Now I understand why the psyhrinks went with that concept... (it is a probably more comforting for the victims. and I suspect it does have a grain of truth.) but if it were only about power... how come everytime you see rape on the news, the victims are usually young. Also when you do get to see the pictures... pretty. I think it is wrong to suggest pedophiles are only doing it for the power... and the existence of mambla would provide evidence. Again, you have to understand the p.c. b.s. behind this whole pedophiles are not gay concept. Gays dont want to be seen as risks to our children.
Because "no" from young and pretty is a lot more "painful" than it is from old and ugly. And I'm not suggesting pedophiles do it only for power, only that power is the prime mover. Edit: last point, what? Pedophiles that go after the opposite sex are not gay, or do you think they are? They predominate, and are a major exception to your argument. (Lucrum, you're out of your depth).
Pedophilia is a fetish. Suggesting pedophiles do it for power is like saying people with foot fetishes like to dominate feet.