This just hit the wires. Turns out only one of the thieves was an atheist. "Atheist and Agnostic break into Church and steal..."
so its your point that within one sentence I should identified the priest as a priest twice. And somehow that would have made my point better. My point being that a male who molests boys is not only a pedophile, he is a homosexual. that is your troll logic.
does he prefer boys? would he as readily molest girls if they were easily accessible? Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in adults or late adolescents (persons age 16 and older) characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty may vary)
and the definition of homosexual is a person who is sexually attracted to a person of the same sex. so a male who molests male children is a pedophile and a homesexual.
I believe that interviews and analysis of these people (pedophiles) has shown that they are overwhelmingly turned on by the power differential of the relationship. This rings true, because if it were simply their gender which excites then they could do that with adults and would not have to risk jail. No, the pedophile is a different animal than the homosexual, and the rapist.
I won't disagree that there is some degree of homosexuality there, I'm only saying that it is the power difference which primarily excites. This is more obvious when you consider those pedophiles who prefer the opposite sex.