Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by olias, Sep 30, 2010.

  1. stu

    stu

    Ask this guy....he'll tell you.....
    ....he'll explain what scientists "say" and will change what they actually do say for you, if it's not going to fit with some intelligent design notion or other.



    You said you had no problems with the laws of physics.
    But do seem to have a problem with a universe from nothing, whilst the laws of physics allow for it.

    Although any explanation, no matter how much fact is contained within, scientific theory or knowledge not in violation of the laws of physics that now exists for a universe from nothing, it's non of that is it?.

    It's only ...."just a theory". Right?
     
    #211     Nov 9, 2010
  2. LMAO!!! Drop the facade STUpid... you're in no position to debate the origin of the universe. You didn't even know about dark energy and dark matter until I schooled you here:
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

    STUpid = moronic troll and poser :p
     
    #212     Nov 9, 2010
  3. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I'm asking YOU.
    I don't know, since I've never seen these "laws" you keep insisting we believe even though as far as I can tell no one has seen any such laws of physics. If you actually produced valid, proven LAWS (not theories) of physics that say what you claim then I'd believe you. How hard is it to copy and paste these laws?
     
    #213     Nov 9, 2010
  4. stu

    stu

    I already said the irrational ramblings that you've made earlier in links you keep referring to are locked, so they are going to remain as dumb as when you first made them.
     
    #214     Nov 10, 2010
  5. stu

    stu

    It's not my fault you insist in asking the wrong question which leads to you getting this ass backwards.

    Presumably you know of the laws of physics as you said you have no problem with them.

    Those same laws of physics are not violated in the theoretical physics which explains how a universe can begin from nothing.

    Now, there is the cue for some dishonest remarks to come from a few God pushers intolerant of anything that might question their "Creator" pre-conclusion.
    Even the laws of gravity get to be called "just a theory", and theoretical particle physics are "just a theory" too which of course they, along with scientific hypothesis and scientific theory, are indeed not.... "just a theory".

    So although the laws of physics allow for a universe to begin from nothing, for some , no amount of anything will allow for the non-necessity of a Magical Macrocosm Maker.

    Does that help any?
     
    #215     Nov 10, 2010
  6. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    A little, though I'm not so sure in the way you intended.
     
    #216     Nov 10, 2010
  7. stu

    stu

    No way intended, it's how things are...
    The laws of physics allow when the laws of physics are not being violated.
    They are not violated in the theoretical physics which explains how a universe can begin from nothing.
     
    #217     Nov 10, 2010
  8. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    So...then it's just a theory?

    :D
     
    #218     Nov 10, 2010
  9. stu

    stu

    Creator God, not even a theory.
    Yeah you could say that
     
    #219     Nov 11, 2010
  10. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Why do you keep bringing up God, do all you rebuttals have to include a childish comment about God?

    I was talking about your theoretical physics.
     
    #220     Nov 11, 2010