Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says

Discussion in 'Religion and Spirituality' started by olias, Sep 30, 2010.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    For the umpteenth time, WHICH SPECIFIC LAWS?
     
    #151     Oct 29, 2010
  2. you wouldn't understand it if we told ya dumb redneck
     
    #152     Oct 29, 2010
  3. stu

    stu

    The amount of dark energy (if it exists) is estimated.

    The amount of dark energy (if it exists) is known.

    Your attempt at so called schooling via the University of Sadly Uninformed Childish Knuckleheads(USUCK) happens to be wrong, however much you bitch about it.
     
    #153     Oct 31, 2010
  4. stu

    stu

    For the umpteenth time+1, LOOK IT UP!

    You said you had no problem with the laws of physics.
    So you should have no problem with the laws of physics that allow for gravity.
    Then you should have no problem with the laws of physics that allow for a universe from nothing.

    But it doesn't really matter to you WHICH SPECIFIC LAWS, does it?.
    It all becomes.... gravity...."just a theory" ..... Right?

    So to sound in someway plausible, a Galactic God Goblin Creator magically becomes "just a theory" too. Although of course it really doesn't.
    Compared with the laws of physics, the idea of a supernatural creator is an awful lot less than a whim never mind a theory..
     
    #154     Oct 31, 2010
  5. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    I did only I couldn't find any applicable LAWS of physics. I did find "models" and theories though.

    It's possible I don't, if only I could find some.

    You really should save this extremely tired "argument" for those that are trying to convince you there is a God.
     
    #155     Oct 31, 2010
  6. LMAO!!! You know damn well that you didn't know shit about dark energy until I schooled you here:
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

    STUpid = lying moronic troll.
     
    #156     Nov 1, 2010
  7. By your own logic, God is just as plausible as no God:
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2953564#post2953564
    http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2956316#post2956316
     
    #157     Nov 1, 2010
  8. Ok smart ass...so back when there was "nothing", how did those laws of physics come around? If there was nothing, then by definition there were no physics because you need something for physics to work.

    In your world 0 + 0 = 1 but any kindergartner can tell you thats not so.
     
    #158     Nov 1, 2010
  9. stu

    stu

    Smart ass...? ... so touchy.

    In kindergartner terms then...The laws of physics allow the 'physics' to begin from nothing.
    Clear enough?

    What're you going to do? Change them?
     
    #159     Nov 2, 2010
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    Peil, to be fair, you must accept that new observations can present very strange ideas. Consider quantum entanglement, for example. Or the relativity of time, for another. These are observed phenomena, and make no (common) sense. You could say that God, in his infinite complexity, has given us such a marvelous universe, if you will.
     
    #160     Nov 2, 2010