Personally, I don't see what's wrong with the weak anthropic principle. Imho, we don't need a "multiverse" to give us sufficient odds, this universe is already big enough.
So which THEORY are you (seriously?) suggesting applies to superstitious beliefs about a makebelieve Sky Beast Creator?
Who is calling stupid exactly?..... Of course I have no objection to your personal beliefs. But I have a feeling if we were discussing this a hundred and something years ago, as far as your personal beliefs go , you'd be thinking science provides a stronger argument for everything up to the actual moment of lightening, even though the laws of physics allowed for lightening.
I'm not. I'm asking, yet again, for the law(s) of physics which YOU have mention repeatedly that says a universe can spontaneously appear from nothing.
I'm calling you STUpid because you are. For example: http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2953564#post2953564 http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2956316#post2956316
Stu can you please expain to me why, when i go through 7 pages of your posts, every single post attacks religion? Are you a closet catholic?
You're not? Are you sure? If you are misunderstanding religion to be a theory in the same way evolution is a theory, how are you going to accurately consider the issue?. With that sort of reasoning, why wouldn't you always default to the moribund and redundant, everything is "just a THEORY" argument no matter what? So the laws of physics that allow a universe to begin from nothing would just be another THEORY, which of course is purposely misleading and/or dishonest.
Non of my posts attack religion per se. I attack, if that is the appropriate description, reasons given for pretending the claims being made for and by religion are valid. This is a thread about religion. Why wouldn't I be posting about religion in all 7 of the posts you counted ? Seeing as you asked, I'm not enough of a superstitious self-hater to be any sort of catholic .
Pretty sure, but what's that got to do with you not posting the law of physics that says a universe can suddenly appear out of nothing? How may times will you avoid this by answering questions with questions?
How do you know? Give us your evidence to support these claims. Besides, no one claims it was made by "chance", they claim it was made by natural selection and evolution, which are systematic processes, not random luck. I hardly think that a majority of the world's top chemists, biologists, and evolution researchers are "naive" and "autistic", they are far more qualified than you on the matter. You are the one overestimating your knowledge of the subject, overestimating your logical reasoning skills, and making unfounded assertions without supplying evidence.