My issue with atheism (a pursuit with great interest followed with devotion) is you want me to put faith in a religion that promotes Nothing came from nothing to become something.
Nothing came from nothing to create algae to create everything. How does evolution explain the masses on ET that still have the brains of algae ?
What do people call the Cause/Process of creating/evolving from nothing to the existing of something? As the word such as God/Origin might be very much unacceptable to some people!
Your issue is ill-informed. Atheism is about the absence of faith and religion, not want of it. You might as well say lifeguards want you to drown due to the absence of drowning. Yeah I know, the pretense that no faith is faith, is that ridiculous. Science, not atheism, describes, how there is something rather than nothing. Doesn't need faith, but scientific inquiry, discovery and knowledge about the physical world. I can see the headlines now... BREAKING NEWS No Evolution! God Is Why ET Masses Have Algae Brains. good luck with that one.
you are such a natural troll that you won't even admit you are arguing for random chance. 2. and to your quote just above... how many times do we have to put your something from nothing Hawking statement in the context of a multiverse. An unseen unproven untested God like multiverse.
Is this the same science that wants me to believe and place faith in unproven assumptions in the Big Bang theory ? So how is science any different from religion when you want me to accept assumptions as truth without any proof?
There are several main pieces of evidence that support the Big Bang theory. One is the fact that the universe is expanding, proven with something called red shift. The second is something called cosmic microwave background radiation. And it does not say that something came from nothing.
Science is altogether fundamentally different from religion. Science is proof without conclusion. Religion is conclusion without proof.