Have you ever noticed that when this point is raised by any thinking person, you never get a cogent response?
His spiritual superiority and rectitude, of course. His oneness with The Almighty. God speaks through him, don't you know.
"Just because it cannot be proven there couldnât be something, does not put or give any value in saying there could be something." So stop proffering up nonsense like the Big Bang, which cannot be proven.
Pure BS... I have already gone through to demonstrate God is not a Giant (God is beyond size, it is said God is larger than the largest and smaller than the smallest). I have already gone through to demonstrate that God is not possible "magic" because God is fully natural, not unnatural. So magic is a ridiculous concept to apply to God. It only appears to be magic to the ignorant, just like what modern man is able to do with technology would be considered magic to someone from thousands of years ago. This sky business has already been defeated, as God is beyond the sky. The sky is a limited existence, and God is unlimited. No unlimited existent being could be bound by the sky, or the firmament. The fairy stuff is again ridiculous, as no literature from theistic sources has ever described God as a fairy. Only the atheists take that point of view. A fairy is a limited being, where God is unlimited in all aspects. Atheists can't even argue against the concepts of God, they have to make up these childish references like "Giant Sky Fairy." It is really telling how you refuse to argue against anything but a Judeo Christian concept of God... Furthers my theory that you were likely brought up Christian and buggered and/or abused by a Christian father...left so badly damaged as a child because you trusted the daddy figure that you are left unable to explore concepts of God that are beyond the scope of Judeo Christian concepts of God. Heck, even the descriptions of God in the Old Testament don't refer to God in the childish manner you do... In addition, if a scientist of few hundred years ago talked of scientifically impossible things of their day (according to the level of science) would those ideas be imagination, or insight? Imagination of something that is not possibly existent is predicated on something that is not real, or could not be real, but as you and your clan have failed to show the impossibility of God being true, someone having an internal vision or concept of God is not know to be an imagination. It could easily be a fact. Man could not fly at one time, but we have show it to be true that man can fly via technology, so imaginations of flying machines were not false...they were true insights. If God is true, then it is not an imagination. Since you fail every time to show God is false, then you have not shown the concept of God to be false. Imagining something that does actually exist is not the same as imagining something that doesn't possibly exist. This would be akin to someone imagining a largest prime number. That would be pure imagination without foundation based on mathematical laws. If God exists, if God is true, then imaginations of God are also true. They are inner visions of something true. God is true, God does exist, and your imaginations that God is not true or that God does not exist are all part of the mental illness of atheism. It is a bit like saying there is no entirety, there is no sum total of everything, there is no totality of the universe...just useless empty rubbish. Just your bloody opinion based on the childhood wounding that chokes off any possible spiritual experience...or common sense in these discussions.
It is said so by whom? Someone who saw him? You, perhaps? You certainly seem to know his dimensions and intentions.
There's that beam of spirituality shining through the mist again. Do tell us what it's like to be enlightened.
Try exploring religions beyond your limited fixation on Judeo Christian theology... God has no dimensions nor intentions, God is beyond dimensions or intentions.