You can serve a poor man who shares with you all he has, or you can serve a man who has everything who shares with you all he has... Free will to make the stupid choice... If you think you can exit this life without serving someone, you are as foolish as you come across... LOL!!! LOL!!! LOL!!!
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sqxW6E24Jh8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sqxW6E24Jh8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
all that was a pathetic waste time. One simple fact so devastating to your world view you have to jerk yourself off like that.... science does not rule out Creator. 1. Scientific measurement gets cut off a split second after the big bang. That first fraction of second is unknown to science as we know it today. 2. Therefore anyone with a working brain cell realizes science does not speak to the creation of anything prior to that point. -- Currently that is you best argument for "no Creator".... Science is incompetent to conclude. -- Now - I have given you quotes from many scientists who say the world is so fine tuned - the universe looks designed. Some argue that although it is fine tuned - if there are almost infinite other universes then you do not have to conclude there is a Creator. you are the one who does not understand science.
If you want a big bang, then you gotta provide evidence of what came before the big bang for the rational being. Otherwise suck your own Don Juan, Sancho Panza..
there was NOTHINGNESS before the Bing Bang. or maybe smthg? a creator?? but, if so, what before that? and that??
Ahh, another everything from nothing... ROTFL!!! Sure, that makes sense...show me some evidence of that nothingness...and no, your ignorance of something is not nothingness... Now go suck your Don Juan Sancho Panzy... LOL!!! LOL!!! LOL!!!
What I have been saying is that science can not rule out a creator. I am not saying I can prove a creator. Its just a delusion to say your know there was no creator. Science has no dog in that hunt.
Science cannot prove Russell's Teapot. So does that mean Russellâs Teapot could exist? duh! One devastating fact you obviously cannot cope with is, saying âcanât prove there is not - so there could beâ is totally defunct . Just because it cannot be proven there couldnât be something, does not put or give any value in saying there could be something. Another devastating fact you cannot obviously cope with is, it will only ever be science and the scientific method that will give you any substantive validation and required explanations to prove or disprove what , if anything, created the universe. Thatâs why you like to âquoteâ scientists. All you can hope for is they do not prove there is no âCreatorâ in your life time. Muttering to an invisible creator fairy in the sky is never going to alter that devastating fact.
Right so you're not a Christian , you don't imagine God and you don't think God is real. To deal with the concept of God that you âput forthâ lol, â¦.. what you describe clearly has everything to do with a childish concept of something you call God with all the attributes of a child's invisible friend, or a "giant magic sky fairy." All the aggression and abusive anger and snide remarks in your posts is about what? Trying to mask your folly is not possible because you know you âre supposed to be adult but still have an imaginary friend, which is well,â¦. really quite sad!