Nice 3rd grade comeback. This from the guy who believes that if someone cant answer how the universe came into existence, it somehow supports HIS idiotic position Yeah.... right. You already clearly proved in the previous thread that you havent a clue how to reason properly. Serveral people shot you down into pieces and now your just angry and embarassed. Its ok...we understand Your reasoning skills are the worst ive seen in a long time and they are well documented now on ET for all to see. Congrats. peace axeman
Just how helpless is CONTRARIAN when it comes to reason? Here is the evidence: AXEMAN SAID: When an atheist has no evidence for the belief in god, he claims that he does not BELIEVE in god, he does NOT claim that god does NOT exist. That would be illogical. (This is my position) CONTRARIAN REPLIES: EXACTLY! YOU are illogical. Atheism is the belief that there is no God. agnosticism is a "neutral" belief in which the individual is not yet convienced one way or the other. Note: I never asserted god DOESNT exist. And yet his stupid little brain somehow perceives that I am in fact making the very logical error which I stated atheists DONT make. Can you say clueless? Can you say reading comprehension problems? Amazing how that little brain cant make such a simple logical jump. Hellooooo..... for the 100th time, I am a WEAK ATHEIST which by definition means that I do NOT assert that god doesnt exist. My position is precisely the one I stated at the beginning of this page. But apparently, your little brain is incapable of grasping such a simple concept. You THINK that I assert god doesnt exist when I have made it SO clear this is not the case. You read things which are NOT even there. Do you hear little voices inside your head too, by any chance like 777 does??? So sad...so sad. Seek help. peace axeman
Hmmm...I keep longshot on ignore so I cant read his posts, which im sure are just as idiotic as always. But I can tell that he continually stalks me here on ET. So pathetic. Just more proof that he realizes that he was TROUNCED in former debates with me and now must follow me around like a sick little stalker and take pot shots. My signature explains why he is like this. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=341724#post341724 Where is longshotspenis? We need a report! I strongly suspect the poor little guy has gotten a lot smaller recently, and this is the reason longshot feels such a strong need to STALK me on ET. That poor little fragile ego just couldnt take the beating, and now he proves it again and again by stalking me. LMAO! Truly sick. peace axeman
"Stalking you"?? LOL AS soon as I log on I fall over a half-dozen of your new and unimproved RANTS. LMAO! you are soooo pathetic..
Often when one such as axeman loses a debate he resorts to name calling. When you can't successfully argue the point of the message you simply attack the messenger. LOL You failed to clearly debate the issue. No wonder YOU hide behind the redefining of words so that you don't have to clearly argue the opposing objections to your position. You claim to be a soft atheist but yet you have not offered an intelligent alternative to argument of origins. You have chosen to rather ignore that side of the discussion simply because you do not want to examine the alternative arguments. It is easy to just say that a counter argument is false or silly and to simply ignore it. Thats not having an open mind. We can only have a good discussion when BOTH parties have an opened mind. I am clearly open to examining contrary evidence to my belief system. Are you? So far you have not demonstrated that. You still have yet to reply to my response to YOUR ridiculous claims and re-interpretation of Scripture. ARogueTrader was right about your childish behavior. This link says it all. http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=25092&perpage=6&pagenumber=57
Nonsense. You lost the debate because you have not made any sense and have failed to provide any evidence at all. That is glaringly obvious and many posters have pointed this out. *IM* redefining words? Thats laughable. You simply have proven you dont even KNOW the definition of the words, so when I give you the correct definition you assume im redefining them. Thats what is so funny Your ignorance is astounding. You lack of reasoning even worse. Ive given clear examples, as have others, as to why your reasoning is nonexistent. Again.... you cling to the silly idea that if I do not provide and intelligent alternative to the existence of the universe that this somehow supports your position, further proving you havent the slightest clue how to reason properly. You are also incapable of learning because several people have clearly explained why this line of reasoning is flawed, and yet you still continue to follow it. You simply dont posses the mental tools required to debate this subject with any of the atheists on this board and you have made that embarrassingly obvious. Now run off and spew the same shit out again, proving once again that you cant seem to learn a thing. peace axeman
Yo from where I'm sittin looks like GA has a point. You have not responded to his response on your critique of Scripture? Stay Blunted.
I believe in God.....I agree with everything Guardian says.....but Im failing to see how Axe has been destroyed in this argument?? Im reading this thread and it's kind of like arguing over who would win a fight: SUPERMAN or THE HULK.....sure there are great points about Superman being able to fly and being bulletproof and that he'd definitely win a fight based on all his powers compared to the HULk's brute strength........but at the end of that day, there is no way to prove something that doesn;t exist....so your left with hypotheticals and FAITH... ps...I think Wolverine vs Hulk would be a better match
What response???? He simply CLAIMED I was wrong. He DID NOT ****SHOW**** where I was wrong. Maybe I missed it??? Care to point out exactly where he explained why I am wrong? Please QUOTE him. I listed bible contradictions. He waved his hand ands simply claimed I did not understand scripture. This is NOT proof. Its an unsupported statement. Furthermore... the bible contradictions are from a PREACHER! So to claim the preacher is clueless is laughable. IM STILL WAITING FOR HIS REPLY! peace axeman