How wide? Say a stock is trading at around 8 bucks and you have 1000 shares of them at that price. How would you do with a stop loss?
Good question. I don't trade stocks. I trade futures and spot forex. I use the previous support or resistance level and place the stop a few ticks outside of that. As price moves and forms a new S/R level I adjust the stop to not more than breakeven. Most of the time I exit on technicals so I stop adjusting the stoploss at breakeven. I hope that answers your question.
%% Great quote,BB; plenty of truth in that one.And that was WAAAAY before computers+ Investors Business Daily news paper was invented .One NasdaQQQ market maker warned-- plenty of traders went broke taking small profits[ most likely larger losses.....]LOL. B BARUCH was a GOOD QUAIL SHOT, 2
Risk half a percent of your total equity, per trade. 0.25% - 0.5% of total account equity. Say account is 50,000 USD. 250 USD = 0.5% of total account equity. 1000 shares = 25 cent stop = 250 bucks.
I usually hold for a 250-300 point profit, if my emergency stop is 25 points. Usually I can get my stop down to about 60% of that. So I'm trying for trades that are 10-20R That's really key. Seeing it in terms of R. Risk is always proportional to reward. Bigger risk demands a trader goes for a bigger reward etc. The key is to get Reward above the 7-8 range....really try to gas it.....
%% Sounds fine, on the math; A28 since you have been posting, for over 10 years. Frankly, sounds WAAAAAY to big[1,000 x $8.......] for a learning trader- investor.Of course some people value a real expensive education much , much more ......LOL
the exit method is well dependent on the trading system you are trading; it could be mean reversion (smaller TP, bigger SL) or trend following (bigger TP, smaller SL); and the volatility of hte market you are trading, and the timeframe..etc. when you pick an exit method; you ought to backtest it in various market conditions; hence backtesting is a must. Backtesting does not guarantee the system will work in the future; but it will guarantee that a system that failed a backtest will not work in the future. Hence it reduces 50% of potentially bad systems.