off subject but you know I've looked at studying options off and on 3 or 4 times in my life and I just don't have the mental horsepower for mastery of the subject. Seems to me ,Too many working parts and ways to get screwed even if you are relatively competent. I mean it looks to me like going up to a roulette table and them adding 1or 2 zeroes to the mix and I believe it's a zero sum game before commissions. Whereas stocks are a positive sum game and more straight forward , less ways of getting screwed like having your shorts called away. Something you virtually have no control over. causing a "forced error of sorts ".
More like this guy PT. So FC installs carbon production units and owns a fire-stick-that-goes-boom? Oh the shame!
Amazing isn't it, The only person proselytizing more and probably just as hypocritical is freethinker.
wow, this et section (pol &rel ) is some hopping place. i can't believe i never ventured in til recently, lol
I don't think anybody wants to admit to it...but a few people have jokingly said that "P&R" is responsible for about 90% of the traffic on this site...maybe not 4-5 years ago, but nowadays...I'd say that it's pretty accurate.
I think it actually used to be more. A few years back the quality of debate was a lot higher with far less personal attacks.
There may have been more debate in P&R, but there was also alot more activity in the various trading forums...many, many people have disappeared since 2007-08..and there were quite a few who left between 2003-07. That's why I think that, as a percentage, more of the traffic is in P&R, even if there is an overall dropoff in visits to this site.
Yeah, the two sides are literally miles apart now...and I thought it was pretty bad when Dubya was f'ing things up...I had no idea how bad it would get or, how much worse it WILL get.