Discussion in 'Politics & Religion' started by wilburbear, Dec 6, 2010.
When you Google this story, none of the major news groups carry it.
Regular news channels look out for their own interests before they report to you.
Correct....they have to play "the GAME" or they get CUT OFF from the system and access ("directed" news stories).
ACCESS is the leverage! :eek:
All you have to do is look and listen to him for a few minutes
and its pretty easy to figure out Assange is a deranged lunatic.
They don't want to lose their credibility
Maybe so. But that is hardly the argument you should be making to deranged lunatics.
Assange is just another pawn in a "directed" psychological mind FU%& distraction going on in the world media/geopolitical game right now.
Does anyone even know WHO owns WikiLeaks?
The WikiLeaks website first appeared on the Internet in December 2006. The site claims to have been "founded by Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and start-up company technologists, from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa". The creators of WikiLeaks have not been formally identified. It has been represented in public since January 2007 by Julian Assange and others.
KEEP DIGGING! :eek:
Also, NEWT (minion puppet boy) you are a complete DUMB FU&%!!!
Newt Gingrich video........ http://www.infowars.com/newt-gingrich-julian-assange-is-enemy-combatant-engged-in-warfare/
About those rape charges.
"They're not "rape," everyone agrees--because the sex was consensual. They also aren't unspecified "molestation."
What they appear to be is a violation of a Swedish law against "having sex without a condom."
Interestingly, even that charge doesn't appear to precisely apply in this case.
A condom was apparently used--initially. But it broke. So the dispute is about whether it broke "accidentally" (he said) or it broke "on purpose" (she said).
That DEFINITELY sounds like a job for Interpol."
Separate names with a comma.