Arizona wants to cut power from illegal immigrant homes

Discussion in 'Politics' started by .........., Jul 1, 2010.

  1. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...n_barry_wong_wants_to_cut_power_from_ill.html


    One Arizona politician has made a vow to make illegal immigrants powerless -- literally.

    Republican Barry Wong, a candidate for the Arizona Corporation Commission, an elected body that decides public utility issues, says he would require the utilities to check the immigration status of customers, he told the Arizona Republic.

    "I'm sure there will be criticism about human-rights violations," said Wong, who held a temporary spot on the five-person Commission in 2006. "Is power or natural gas or any type of utility we regulate, is that a right that people have? It is not a right. It is a service."

    Cutting electricity, water, natural gas, even telephone lines at the homes of illegal immigrants, he said, would lower costs for the rest of the state's customers. He believes the population spike caused by illegal immigrants forces the state to build new power plants and then raise rates for customers.

    Since 2000, Arizona's population has jumped nearly 29% to almost 6.6 million people. In roughly that same time, the number of the state's Hispanic residents increased and now composes more than 30% of Arizona's population, according to the U.S. Census.

    This isn't the first time electricity surged into the immigration debate.

    In May, after Los Angeles' City Council voted to boycott Arizona over its controversial anti-illegal immigration law, SB 1070, Gary Pierce, who sits on the Commission, suggested L.A. stop using his state's power.

    Pierce, also a Republican, dismissed Wong's idea.

    "That's not an argument I think we'll involve ourselves in," he said.

    Critics, however, charge Wong with simply using a hot-button issue to gain notoriety and votes.

    "Everyone is seeing the polls that are so anti-immigrant, and everyone is jumping on the bandwagon to target immigrants," said Julie Pace, a lawyer currently suing the state over a law punishing businesses that hire illegal immigrant help.

    "They all are coming up with novel ideas how they can get elected. They say, 'Target immigrants, and it helps me win an election.'"

    Wong believes his idea deserves further study.

    "The question is: Is it the right thing to do in terms of rates?" Wong, a former four-term member of the state's House of Representatives, told the paper.

    Arizona has come under fire for months for its efforts to battle illegal immigration, which was put under the national spotlight with the passage of SB 1070, which would allow law enforcement to ask suspects about their immigration status. However, the law which goes into effect July 29, has its supporters.

    According to a recent Rasmussen poll, 71% of Arizona backs it, an increase from when Gov. Jan Brewer signed the bill in April.
     
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    Arizona wants to cut power from illegal immigrant homes


    Good, it's about time.
     
  3. I disagree. Cutting power to the home of an illegal immigrant accomplishes little in the quest to rid the country of illegals. Little in comparison to the potential damage it could do. There's no sense in it. The idea is crafted to be "punishment", and I'm against it.

    Instead, the utilities should report those with illegal status to the government or local authorities to be handled for deportation. But they're not getting power for free. They're paying for it. Additionally, it is not the responsibility of public utilities to determine who is and who is not a citizen. If they have a valid driver's license, then they got that through the state's DMV and THAT is where the loophole is. Correct that instead.

    Keep your eyes on the ball. The objective is to IDENTIFY who the illegals are in order to get them out of the country. It is not to deal out punishment. As long as we keep our eyes on the ball, we have legal grounds to win this fight. When we start subjecting illegal aliens to all sorts of penal philosophy, we begin to lose that.