What are you talking about? *I* posted the video. I didn't ignore any of your posts. I addressed all of them, irrelevant as they were. LOL!! You just contradicted yourself. White nationalism doesn't mean forceful removal or segregation? How else would these white nationalists achieve an all white nation/state (the desire for which is what defines a white nationalist). Do you suppose it's done by explaining your feelings and getting the non white people to leave voluntarily? ROFLMAO!!! Of course white nationalism means the forceful/mandatory removal of non whites from the nation or from a given region (to become a new "white nation"). Unless you think they would want to make it optional... And sorry, but just because someone believes in the fairness of an identity for whites, or is an opponent of multiculturalism does not make them a white nationalist, nice try though... Btw, I noticed you didn't link to your source for that definition. Let me guess... is it because it was wikipedia??? ROFLMAO!!!
You didn't, Jared Taylor was making the distinction between Europeans and Jews, he was not distinguishing between ethnicities. There is no contradiction, white nationalism advocates for segregation, doesn't mean it can only be forceful. You make up definitions as you go and then laugh because my source is wikipedia? You do know that wikipedia cites its sources, you can easily look them up. Its amazing how you don't see AmRen's publications as simply 'fairness of white identity', it is nothing but blatant racism and there is no hiding that fact. http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives.php
Yes it was an ethnic distinction. What evidence do you have to offer to say that it wasn't? Besides your own personal claim of course... There is a contradiction. Any white nationalist segregation would be mandatory, not optional. That means any non compliant non white would be forcibly segregated. I didn't make up any definitions, I simply told you what a white nationalist is, since your only source is apparently wikipedia. I see amren's publications as their right and freedom. Is it "racist"? Well it depends on how you define "racist". For many people (including the wikipedia editors), anyone who believes that race is a biological reality, and not merely a "social construct" is a racist. If that's your definition then yes, AmRen is "racist".
More ad nauseam. Anyway, thanks for admitting that AmRen is racist, there is no need to keep hiding behind pseudo intellectual garbage.
+1 I'd add that libturds will also try to turn it against gun rights. Speaking of which, Giffords was PRO gun rights which is another reason why the lunatic who shot her had leftist leanings.
I hesitate to point this out as the incident is an awful tragedy, but US has a history of assassinating politicians. Remember Huey Long of Louisiana? Just like the police officer killed in the line of fire, it comes with the territory. I know that some states send the State Police with officials to events like this. A couple of shotgun toting lawmen might make a difference. I don't know, but calls for gun control is the height of stupidity.
sickening vulture.... liberals are the most vile people. A consensus could easily be made that the guy was attracted to extremes at either end and made few rationale decisions on his own. you liberal vultures, just disgusting. "Look a wacko went nuts..Right-Wing, ILLEGALIZE THEM, Re-Educated Them, Make them surrender, we have the trial lawyers on our side!" sick-fucking-people