Non sequitur. If he made the same distinction but used French Canadian instead of Jew, would that mean that French Canadians are not white? Of course not. It would mean that he was making a distinction between French Canadians and other white people. In the same way that he makes a distinction about Jews and other whites. Instead of bitch and whine like a little girl with me, why don't you listen to what the founder of AmRen himself has to say on this topic: <object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bean6vT-2ms?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bean6vT-2ms?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
This is what he said - âThere is something relentlessly convincing about examining a race or a sub-group, whether it is Japanese, Chinese, Jews, blacks, Europeans, or Indians, and finding that wherever they are, whatever their circumstances, their achievements as a group are almost perfectly predicted by their average IQ.â Note the clear distinction betweeen "Jews" and "Europeans." He is clearly not just talking about ethnicities here, I dont know why you keep implying that. Why don't you show me where he makes the distinction between French Canadians and Europeans?
Ok, keep splitting hairs all you like. I just showed you a video where he addressed that topic specifically... And after all, *I* am the one who actually corresponds with the man, but I'm sure you know better (via psychic inference or something i guess...)
He'll deny 'til the cows come home, but this is a guy who thinks the Civil War wasn't fought over slavery. No surprise he'd be in contact with and know about these folks. I'd never heard of them.
LOL!!! Way to ignore the 'points' you thought you made until you got your ass handed to you on them, then moved on to another "point" where you think you have a case.. Don't worry, it's not REALLY transparent or anything... LMAO!! The answer is, it depends on how you define your terms. AmRen are not white nationalists. i.e. they have never advocated any forceful removal of non whites, or forced separation of whites from non whites. No, AmRen are not white nationalists. Do WNs read AmRens publications? Do they comment on AmRen articles? I don't know for certain, but I can't imagine that they do not. However, just because some WNs read AmRen doesn't make AmRen a WN organization. Just like reading an economics magazine doesn't make you an economist or money manager. Regardless, AmRen is not a WN organization, and is not "far right" as your thread title indicates. More importantly, the shooter has no ties to it.
The democrats are taking the murder of a democratic congresswoman by an leftist loon and turning it into some kind of means to institute censorship on conservative media. Its vile. I'm thinking this is going to backfire on them big time.
You asked me to view the video, I don't know what points you made? You completely ignored my post and went on a diatribe about ethinicity which was not what we were talking about. I posted it twice for your benefit, both times you ignored it. Again, white nationalism doesn't mean forceful removal or segregation, you need to look up some definitions before you make really dumb claims. "White nationalism is a political ideology which advocates a racial definition of national identity for white people, as opposed to multiculturalism, and a separate all-white nation state. White separatism and white supremacism are subgroups within white nationalism"
What? Another liberal fucktard who doesn't know the difference between islamofascist terrorists and a leftist nutcake domestic assassin? Well surprise surprise surprise!