Im not arguing if you are good or not, Im saying your sharing qualiy sucks, yet you make it sound like you doing readers a favor.
Just some thoughts: Can we agree markets range more than they trend? At least markets that aren't artificially supported. Can we also agree that buying/selling highs/lows is associated with trending markets and the opposite with ranges. Also TF has a major impact on the above statements. But the most critical aspect to all of this is your beliefs and your interaction with the market. Rande Howell has a very interesting video called "Overcoming fear and sabotage in your trading." At this stage of my awareness I believe his take on the mental side of it to be the "holy grail" I went to a EST type seminar a long time ago and asked one of the leaders there, what was the meaning of a particular word and he said it didn't matter what his definition was, only mine. It took me a long time to truly understand the implication of that statement.
Sounds like some nonsense. The only way that might not be nonsense is if you ask someone how they interpret a painting or something. When someone asks me the definition of a word I give them a specific definition with examples for clarity. Then again, I'm not a "guru."
Because to be able to keep a short leash on your trade you need a trail a stop fairly close, and those surely get hit prematurely the vast majority of times.
Horse to water. I shared some explicit stuff in two of 123abc's threads and nobody commented on it, save one person. The confrontational tenure is really coming from your end. If you have any questions, I'd be happy to answer. But it seems people would rather take shots...
Absolutely; a tight stop will probably get hit prematurely. So if you are going to let your winners run, youâll probably have to do something else. I didnât see anything in RNs statement about a tight stop.