lol what a circular bit of mumbo jumbo. I’m not going to try to talk stats to you as it’s clear you’re getting lost in semantics and do not know what you’re talking about. Probability is not a prediction, you make a prediction based upon a probability. If you react, you are still making a prediction lol, based upon your understanding of your probabilities.
There you go. So you finally admit it. So what good is your carnival contest as relates to Price Action Trading? Also What does your contest say about 95% of "Price Action Traders", those without stats?
I never said probabilities = prediction lol anyway, price action continues to be a poor technique in assessing what direction price will move to next.
“Price action” is a hackneyed term used by course sellers. “Bar-by-bar” is sometimes used in conjunction. Nonetheless, monitoring real-time price activity and having instant market access can be the basis of a trading edge. Think Livermore and bucket shops in the early 20th century.
Not so fast, Kreskin, lol. Before you run out the back door of the tent with the money Your conclusion is erronious in the extreme. It speaks to the practitioners of "Price Action Trading" who responded to your circus contest but it does not at all address the effectiveness of the technique called "Price Action Trading". Prove me wrong.
What have you presented that addresses the effectiveness of the technique called "Price Action Trading".
Psss: Can I make a suggestion, you'll get nowhere debating with some of these characters, waste of time and talent.